Re: [atomic-devel] Info regarding process for generating [custom] ISO

On 2/18/20 9:39 AM, Ananthu R V wrote: > Hi Dusty,  > > Thanks for the update.  We were looking at more of a remix which can passed > on and used by a wider set of people.  > > Do you think Kickstart approach will work this? My understanding is that for > this to w

Re: [atomic-devel] Info regarding process for generating [custom] ISO

t points the install at your custom OSTree repo/ref. Then you install your custom content, but you don't need to generate your own ISO. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Nearing End Of Life

On 11/25/19 11:41 AM, Normand wrote: > > > On 11/21/19 11:33 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> This content also exists at: >> https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/ >> >> Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Nearing End Of Life

This content also exists at: https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/ Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1] including that Fedora CoreOS would be the successor to Fedora Atomic Host and Container Linux (from CoreOS Inc.). As part of that succe

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20191001.0

est-2ami-0c4432b4c83d558e1 hvm gp2 The aarch64 AMIs are here: Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20191001.0.aarch64 eu-west-1ami-0c69e2d303b86294a hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20191001.0.aarch64 us-east-1ami-0fdda427ebad7f1ae hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20191001.0.aarch64 us-east-2ami-09edd482ba66314fc hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20191001.0.aarch64 us-west-2ami-0e99629765afa hvm gp2 The Vagrant Cloud page with the new Atomic Host: https://app.vagrantup.com/fedora/boxes/29-atomic-host https://app.vagrantup.com/fedora/boxes/29-atomic-host/versions/29.20191001.0 Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic 29 EOL date?

the transition is smooth for the Magnum project. Can you all share some time/resources to work with us to make sure we smooth out any wrinkles? Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Failed to deploy/upgrade on Fedora Atomic 29

'https://ostree.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist': While fetching > https://ostree.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist: [6] Couldn't resolve host name That's odd. It seems to work for me. Are you still having trouble? Can you tell me what is in the files in your /etc/ostree/remotes.d/ directory? Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190625.0

On 6/25/19 1:38 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190625.0 > Commit(x86_64): > c50cc86ad7972f85853f1deafda3899eb86a0e5220c613744eed64320298716e > Commit(aarch64): > 0e82ac50808a1513cab1f8ad4c6262c091b

Re: [atomic-devel] Bootable fedora atomic host 29 for cloud(OpenStack)?

On 6/22/19 8:28 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > here > > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/30/Cloud/x86_64/images/ Those are the fedora cloud base images. He asked for the fedora 29 atomic host cloud images. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Bootable fedora atomic host 29 for cloud(OpenStack)?

t 29 image for cloud > (OpenStack)? The qcow2 image from > https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/Linux/dist/fedora-alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190528.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/ > doesn't work for me. Thank you very much. The qcow there works in openstack. It's the only qcow we provide. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190516.0

On 5/16/19 6:27 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190516.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 7f719bf60b865ca96aacd0e8ae3e6074c7eb5783d8ceb9003dbba5dfd5a29ba3 > Commit(aarch64): > 3930a03b8ffcce1aa66f17b8811e2a4da80

Re: [atomic-devel] Rebase Fedora Atomic 27 > 29 fails to boot

On 3/21/19 1:17 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 3/20/19 11:41 AM, Doug Campbell wrote: >> Currently running Fedora Atomic 27.153 >> >> Following instructions at: >> http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2018/10/fedora-atomic-28-to-29-upgrade/ to >> u

Re: [atomic-devel] Rebase Fedora Atomic 27 > 29 fails to boot

int is not connected > > The last line continues to repeat periodically for as long as I would wait. > > I had to reboot and switch back to version 27. > > Please advise how to fix this and upgrade to version 29. > I have not seen that. You may try to go to f28 first and then to f29 and see if that helps. Dusty

[atomic-devel] Removing Atomic Host from Fedora Rawhide

ebase fedora/29/x86_64/atomic-host ``` If you have trouble find me in #atomic or #fedora-coreos on freenode. Dusty signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[atomic-devel] runc CVE-2019-5736 and Atomic Host

Linux blocks this exploit and /usr/ being read-only prevents the runc binary from being overwritten. Even if you had disabled SELinux /usr/ is still mounted read only so you're Atomic Host systems should be safe. Dusty https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-5736

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic Host on Xen PV VM

because the filesystem set up is different than traditional systems. Could you not download one of the cloud images that are provide and boot it? I believe it runs on Amazon AWS PV, but I can't be fur sure. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

On 11/19/2018 04:40 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote: > OK, moving right along - seems to work fine. so you've got everything working? > > I will try to install a few more packages before doing a reboot. > > Thanks much - Bob G

Re: [atomic-devel] Fwd: upgrade 28 to 29

On 10/31/2018 12:55 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > everything is ok now, all packages are here: yay. Thanks @micah for helping out! > --- > % rpm-ostree status > State: idle > AutomaticUpdates: disabled > Deployments: > ● ostree://fedora-atomic-29:fedora/29/x86_6

[atomic-devel] Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.2 is available

FYI: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7862#comment-537918

[atomic-devel] no openshift origin less than 3.11 for Fedora 29 Atomic Host

FYI. It looks like it will not be possible to run older versions of openshift origin (also known as OKD) or kubernetes on Fedora 29 Atomic Host. A more detailed description is in https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/512 Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 29 Atomic and Cloud Test Day on Monday, 1st October

p://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/49 . > > See you all on Monday! > Just rebased one of my f28AH boxes to f29. All looking good so far! Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180917.0

On 09/17/2018 03:19 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180917.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 17b11d74047ded1264a57555a64ae6fc5d02a332c556679bfcf32864fc91f11e > Commit(aarch64): > 95cdc6d02ed7f3645bdd513b07b2c2d

Re: [atomic-devel] Automation of Atomic management

s anybody using some > automation tools on top of Atomic which allows to manage the system? > I think the two approaches are to use cloud-init for on boot provisioning or to use ansible for after the system has been brought up. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Bare metal installation without video display??

On 08/20/2018 07:48 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote: > See my reply interspersed. > > On 08/20/2018 10:26 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> On 08/19/2018 10:50 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote: >>> My particular piece of bare metal seems to have enough memory, disk >>> space, In

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180816.1

On 08/20/2018 04:24 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180816.1 > Commit(x86_64): > c6b1e97b93424c260baa98518277d87f7f4ebf036c09a9a0aeb7097c33c2099c > Commit(aarch64): > 28d35c25fecb561a648ef1f3be30906

Re: [atomic-devel] Bare metal installation without video display??

On 08/19/2018 10:50 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote: > My particular piece of bare metal seems to have enough memory, disk > space, Intel x86_64 architecture w/4 cores, ethernet nics, but it does > not have any video support. > > I can move data using ethernet, but user interaction during install mus

Re: [atomic-devel] socat package has gone away

atrequires socat kubernetes-node-1.5.2-0.7.git269f928.el7.x86_64 ``` Not sure if it should be added back or not, just noting why it got removed. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] [CoreOS] Re: Re: Starting a Container SIG

response, I will >>>> create a Container SIG wiki page, and I guess we can ask for >>>> container-devel mailing list for SIG discussions. >>> >>> What about trying https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/ for discussions >>> instead of a new mailing list? My personal opinion: mailing list/pagure tracker would be more for development discussions and announcements and discourse would be more for user questions. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Starting a Container SIG

mailing list for SIG discussions. Unfortunately I can't sign up to do a bunch of work but I would like to join and help represent Fedora CoreOS and related interests in the SIG. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] fedora 28 atomic workstation

ra" > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=28 > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora" > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=28 > PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy"; > VARIANT="Workstation Edition" > VARIANT_ID=workstation > --- > > Can someone please confirm I am running Fedora Atomic Workstation. > Thank you > Looks right to me. I don't know if anyone ever updated /etc/os-release for FAW to say anything different than just the plain Fedora Workstation edition. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Canceling atomic-wg-apac meeting for 10th July and maybe future meetings as well?

On 07/10/2018 10:35 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Sanja Bonic > wrote: > > Let's schedule the first Fedora CoreOS APAC meeting for the week after > DevConf.in - same time and in #fedora-meeting-1? > > > Devconf.in is on August

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-07-04 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-06-27 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] Announcing the Fedora CoreOS community!

On 06/20/2018 04:52 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > ср, 20 июн. 2018 г. в 17:11, Dusty Mabe : > # What does this mean for Atomic Host? > > The last major release of Fedora Atomic Host will most likely be Fedora > 29 Atomic Host. After Fedora 29 we'll recommend you use Fed

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-06-20

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-06-20/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-06-20-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-06-20/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-06-20-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbo

[atomic-devel] Announcing the Fedora CoreOS community!

os on freenode - - There is a new Discourse board at https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/coreos We're excited to have the existing Container Linux and Atomic Host communities working together and we hope you'll join us in making Fedora CoreOS a success. Dusty [1] https://www.redh

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-06-20 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180613.0

On 06/13/2018 06:23 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180613.0 > Commit(x86_64): > c51100f14cf12b25c16562cede7455191e536c0534e3b2ef87e66be9e12899ae > Commit(aarch64): > 5492bb19612e4c9e4f93c63e0af81e6

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-06-13 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] different package versions on similar machines

s/atomic-host` while the 2nd machine is following `fedora/28/x86_64/atomic-host`. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] essential directories to backup with rsync

oo new with the > filesystem to know which directories to bakcup/exclude. > > I am thinking of rsyncing : > > /var , /boot, /etc. > Those are the main ones that have "state" that isn't in the remote. Looks, like you are on the right track. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] different package versions on similar machines

On 06/11/2018 08:36 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I set up two Fedora atomic machines recently absolutely the same way (same > etc settings, same added packages...). They could have been rsync'ed. > > For unknown reasons, some packages don't have same versions. Some examples: > cockpit-docker.x8

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-06-06 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] docker storage LVM thin pool

lvm2 a--  <100.00g    0 > # vgextend atomicos /dev/vdb >   Can't open /dev/vdb exclusively.  Mounted filesystem? > -- > > What am I doing wrong? How do you guys extend the atomic root with the > storage volume? you can see from the output /dev/vdb is already part of the dockervg volume group, so you can't add it to the atomicos volume group. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Upgrade from kubernetes-apiserver to kubernetes-sig-apiserver

et > Unit kubelet.service could not be found. > This is expected. The kubelet was removed recently in favor of running kubernetes /openshift via containers. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] forbidden base package replacement

fixed by running rpm-ostree upgrade first. If that doesn't fix it you can `rpm-ostree rebase fedora/28/x86_64/updates/atomic-host` to get the latest (but un-released) tree, which should match exactly the yum repo. Summary: - Try rpm-ostree upgrade && reboot + rpm-ostree install - Try `rpm-ostree rebase fedora/28/x86_64/updates/atomic-host` && reboot + rpm-ostree install Dusty

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-05-30

/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-05-30-16.30.log.html . Meeting summary --- * roll call (dustymabe, 16:30:20) * previous meeting action items (dustymabe, 16:32:31) * ACTION: dusty/ashcrow/jberkus try to get community FAQ released around Atomic/CoreOS future (dustymabe, 16:33:07) * dustymabe

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

I get the same feeling. Now I know I can send the links to you and clear my conscious. :) Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

On 05/29/2018 03:06 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180527.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 > Commit(aarch64): > f3f1b43c6bb1fa705d36f4e2b470e1d

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-05-30 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20180528

1b3d122457f21f1664b37182e > Commit(ppc64le): > 372a253acef6db9acced3d1cb09090473567d10a2a9e5d488f487e7df441c696 > LGTM. Testing out by spinning up a new Origin Cluster. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

On 05/25/2018 04:34 PM, Scott McCarty wrote: > Shane, > >     I see nobody has responded. To be honest, I read your email three > times, and I can't quite figure out your use case. I am guessing others > may be heads down working on the new Red Hat CoreOS and hence haven't > had time to dig

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] rebuild atomic fedora image

omic.io/blog/2017/12/compose-custom-ostree/ As far as user-data goes, we just use cloud-init. Docs are here: http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/format.html Hope this helps Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Out of disk space

3.2G 0  3.2G   0% /run/user/0 > yes. With overlay2 as default if you don't give it any other options all the container disk usage will go in the root filesystem > What is the recommended way to grow the space available on root? You can use `lvresize` for this. Please look at the man page [1] first but something like this should work: lvresize cah_b/root --resizefs --size=+30G Dusty [1] https://linux.die.net/man/8/lvresize

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] Atomic Centos PXE Installation

On 05/24/2018 09:26 AM, Joaquin Henriquez wrote: > Discover that a minimum of 4GB needs to be added to the machine. > Did that fix everything for you?

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] Atomic Centos PXE Installation

gt;> saying /dev/root partition can not be found. > > Hmm, not hitting this here. Does this happen before or after fetching > the kickstart? > Can you share a screenshot? Jonathan, Can you share how you copied the files from the ISO and also what your pxelinux.cfg is ? Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

or > both!) for a chance to pick someone’s brain on some of these issues. /me raises hand! Let's get together sometime and chat. Coordinate in IRC. Dusty

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-05-23 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] Question about Docker Storage

17811456 3301476  14509980  19% / > > Is there any way I can get device mapper to use more of that space without > having to add new VGs and run docker-storage-setup? Is there another LV that is the container storage? I'm thinking you should be able to resize the LV. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180515.1

On 05/16/2018 02:03 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180515.1 > Commit(x86_64): > a29367c58417c28e2bd8306c1f438b934df79eba13706e078fe8564d9e0eb32b > Commit(aarch64): > ec501e5a6833e6117632c3a7fc90ef17

Re: [atomic-devel] [atomic] password and user atomic project

an SSH key for the 'fedora' user. If you don't want to deal with cloud init you can install from an ISO image [1], which allows you to set your own password during install, or use the vagrant boxes [2] and let vagrant handle the login for you. Dusty [1] https://alt.fedoraproject

[atomic-devel] Updates for dhcp client issue: CVE-2018-1111

: # rpm-ostree rebase fedora/28/x86_64/updates/atomic-host ... dhcp-client 12:4.3.6-19.fc28 -> 12:4.3.6-20.fc28 dhcp-common 12:4.3.6-19.fc28 -> 12:4.3.6-20.fc28 dhcp-libs 12:4.3.6-19.fc28 -> 12:4.3.6-20.fc28 ... Look out for the new release tomorrow. Dusty -BEGIN PGP

Re: [atomic-devel] Failed to start Docker Storage Setup

here docker won't come up because of a similar problem (i.e. issue with docker-storage-setup service), but I also see another problem. I documented the issues in https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/498 Dusty

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-05-16 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-05-09 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-05-02 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180425.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180425.0 Commit(x86_64): 94a9d06eef34aa6774c056356d3d2e024e57a0013b6f8048dbae392a84a137ca Commit(aarch64): 12a95314084eaa2242bdfe24197774aac163433d2405bc2813b4d89180434630 Commit(ppc64le): d29c4549226ca8a50846360cf

Re: [atomic-devel] Podman-0.4.4 was just releeased.

. > That's good news. I have some good news for you too. We will include podman in the F28AH release next week. It currently pulls in buildah. You're saying in the future we won't need buildah installed but `podman build` will continue to work? Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 28 Atoimic Host RC 1.1 available for testing

On 04/26/2018 08:54 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:05 AM, Dusty Mabe <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote: > > The Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.1 is available for testing now. > > The toplevel directory is: > https://kojipkgs.

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 28 Atoimic Host RC 1.1 available for testing

On 04/25/2018 04:58 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> The Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.1 is available for testing now. >>

[atomic-devel] Fedora 28 Atoimic Host RC 1.1 available for testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The Atomic Host compose based on RC 1.1 is available for testing now. The toplevel directory is: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-28-20180425.0 The cloud images are under the compose/AtomicHost/$arch/images/ directo

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-04-25 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] Newbie atomic questions continued

On 04/20/2018 11:41 AM, Chad Tindel wrote: > Dusty- > > Unfortunately I had signed up for the digest so there's no way to reply, I > fixed that problem moving forward. > >> I not as familiar with packer. Does it run a kickstart install?  > > No, it starts up

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.122

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/19/2018 05:55 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 27.122 > Commit(x86_64): > 931ebb3941fc49af706ac5a90ad3b5a493be4ae35e85721dabbfd966b1ecbf99 > Commit(aar

Re: [atomic-devel] Newbie atomic questions

On 04/19/2018 05:03 PM, Chad Tindel wrote: Hi Chad > 1.  I do a packer build and inside that packer build I add a new systemd > service at /etc/systemd/system/update_route53_mapping.service and I systemctl > enable update_route53_mapping as well. > > I can see that that is done correctly in

[atomic-devel] using the updates-testing repo for layered packages in f28AW

command to disable the updates-testing repo: ``` # sed -i s/enabled=1/enabled=0/ /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo ``` Now try your operation (upgrade/package layer) again. Dusty [1] https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/415 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-04-18 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-04-11 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Community Meeting Minutes 2018-04-03

On 04/04/2018 05:29 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 04/04/2018 02:08 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>>> 2. I had to add a "custom" rpm to enable firmware for my laptop. Is there >>>> any work toward enabling /usr/local/lib/firmware to work? >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Community Meeting Minutes 2018-04-03

sing_b43_firmware_on_fedora_atomic_workstation.html >> . Currently Fedora only accepts /lib/firmware Which of course is read only >> on atomic I'm not really sure why /usr/local/lib/firmware isn't used by Fedora. Maybe we can have someone from the kernel team comment. Added cc to Laura Abbott to see if she knows why. Dusty

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-04-04 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Community Meeting Minutes 2018-04-03

) > --- > * ksinny (70) > * firstyear (68) > * AdrianCeleste (41) > * snarwade (16) > * zodbot (11) > * sayan (8) Thanks everyone who came! Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPb6zG5c6sV89

Re: [atomic-devel] What talking points do we have for Atomic in the F28 release timeframe?

On 03/27/2018 11:06 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Do we have anything I should emphasize for beta, coming up next week? > What about in May? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_talking_points#Fedora_Atomic I opened a ticket and asked @sanja to run it down: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/is

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-03-28 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] SElinux bug in F28 Atomic Workstation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559531 This bug prevents FAW from starting the desktop environment. If you want Atomic Workstation for F28 beta then that bug needs to be fixed ASAP. It would be a shame to miss this opportunity from a marketing perspective. Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] atomic install/run cockpit does not work on atomic-ws

gt; > http://g0alkeeper.blogspot.com/2018/03/blog-post.html Nice! Thanks for helping us reach another audience! Dusty

Re: [atomic-devel] testing atomic ws on virt-manager

ry to reproduce this? I think you are probably hitting: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559531 Try setting selinux to permissive mode. Dusty

[atomic-devel] use botbot.me to log #atomic channel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/438 There has been a proposal to add a nice interface for logged messages in #atomic on freenode. Please add input to the proposal (link above). Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-03-21

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-21/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-21-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-21/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-21-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbot

[atomic-devel] Reminder Meeting Time is in UTC

Our Atomic Working group meeting time is in UTC so if you are in a country that has observed or will observe daylight savings make sure you adjust. The meeting will be at 16:30 UTC https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/atomic/

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-03-21 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

On 03/19/2018 04:30 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > >> So if you maintain a container could you please build your container >> against the f28 and master branch. Everyone please keep in mind that Clement is a new team member and is inher

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic qcow2 image from custom tree

On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Clenimar Filemon wrote: > Hello folks, > Hi! > I'd like to create a custom qcow2 fedora-atomic image for some scenarios I've > been exploring with OpenStack Magnum. I basically need a fedora-atomic image > with a few extra packages installed and a few commands execute

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-03-14 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-03-07

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-07/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-07-16.30.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-07/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-07-16.30.log.html ==

[atomic-devel] Unified ostree repositories in Fedora

e any questions! Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPb6zG5c6sV89tRYPMwLb1zlS5nEFAlqfF5sACgkQMwLb1zlS 5nFPcg/+OHkKWyQcNlulzpNdJyi8tGx3BtmYE5czibhYSJ2iVua6IK3JImI/SWt1 XPm1rtuz5Ldy+vdqLOv6VkGYLDLY6JPz/D6ovyRwAPs3ZXhAZiuws47ZNzQkPeDg lTTEswCRKb4CVJ0MhCUy12wqMBYecfv9eibvGD01v7vuxEK7

[atomic-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2018-03-07 from 16:30:00 to 17:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting a

[atomic-devel] using the quay.io container registry

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I opened a ticket in the atomic working group to discuss using the quay.io container registry for some of our 'upstream' needs. Please discuss this in the ticket: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/430 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiE

[atomic-devel] march VFAD for the atomic working group

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429 In the Atomic working group in Fedora we have occasionally used virtual Fedora Activity Days (VFADs) to get the community together to discuss in a high bandwidth setting (video conference) some techical issues

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.93

2 Fedora-Atomic-27-20180226.0.x86_64 EC2 (eu-west-1) ami-983a40e1 hvm gp2 Fedora-Atomic-27-20180226.0.x86_64 EC2 (sa-east-1) ami-86d59dea hvm gp2 Fedora-Atomic-27-20180226.0.x86_64 EC2 (us-east-1) ami-2b8d6456 hvm gp2 Fedora-Atomic-27-20180226.0.x86_64 EC2 (u

  1   2   3   4   5   >