Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-19 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 06/19/2015 06:01 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > On 06/19/2015 12:47 AM, James wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Colin Walters >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: Hi All, [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-v

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-19 Thread Lalatendu Mohanty
On 06/19/2015 12:47 AM, James wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: Hi All, [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-vagrant-box I don't object exactly, but at some point we're really going

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread James
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > As I go though, I'm also discovering how many of Vagrant's rough edges OMV > helps to handle I've never heard it put so well, but that's exactly how I feel and why I started it. You're a wordsmith. Please help our documentation :) :) ... W

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 19 Jun 2015 5:18 am, "James" wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > This most closely overlaps > > https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/ > > > > The kickstart file has a lot of overlap with (but is not exactly the same as) the > > Vagrant

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread James
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:17 PM, James wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Colin Walters wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >>> Hi All, >> >>> [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-vagrant-box >> >> I don't object exactly, but at so

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread James
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >> Hi All, > >> [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-vagrant-box > > I don't object exactly, but at some point we're really going to have to > invest in > d

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 06/18/2015 01:18 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >> Hi All, >> [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-vagrant-box > I don't object exactly, but at some point we're really going to have to > invest in > de-duplicating

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 06/18/2015 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > > We are working on vagrant box/ boxes [1] to provide ready to use > development environment for atomicapp and nulecule. Currently the base > vagrant box is based on CentOS7, but we can recreate it on Fedora , RHEL > and other RPMs based distro if

Re: [atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 05:53 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > Hi All, > [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-vagrant-box I don't object exactly, but at some point we're really going to have to invest in de-duplicating Vagrant work. See: https://lists.projectatomic.io/pr

[atomic-devel] [Proposal] Move atomicapp Vagrant box git repo under Project Atomic

2015-06-18 Thread Lalatendu Mohanty
Hi All, We are working on vagrant box/ boxes [1] to provide ready to use development environment for atomicapp and nulecule. Currently the base vagrant box is based on CentOS7, but we can recreate it on Fedora , RHEL and other RPMs based distro if required. We have released the first iterati