t;
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Josh Berkus" <jber...@redhat.com>
>> > To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
>> > Sent: Tuesday, Februar
On 02/09/2016 09:46 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 2016-02-09 09:14, Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,
We were discussing the changes in Docker 1.10 at DevConf and became
very concerned about the consequences of pushing it into Fedora23. I
don't think that users will be prepared for the upgrade
On 2016-02-09 09:14, Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,
We were discussing the changes in Docker 1.10 at DevConf and became
very concerned about the consequences of pushing it into Fedora23. I
don't think that users will be prepared for the upgrade process for
existing images. Basically, I can see two
On 02/09/2016 10:57 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> One thing we *could* do is put it in updates testing in F23 but _never_
> put it into stable there. That would allow people who want it to opt in
> to that branch on F23 if they need it.
I'm definitely good with it being in updates testing for F23
Folks,
We were discussing the changes in Docker 1.10 at DevConf and became very
concerned about the consequences of pushing it into Fedora23. I don't think
that users will be prepared for the upgrade process for existing images.
Basically, I can see two things happening to create some really
On 02/09/2016 09:14 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Is it worth considering holding 1.10 back until Fedora24?
We should do so by policy, if I understand correctly. This is not a
compatible change and users can't easily roll back. We should freeze F23
on 1.10, and the two-week atomic releases should
On 2016-02-09 09:46, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 02/09/2016 09:46 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
With "the system being unresponsive" you mean "Docker is unresponsive"
and perhaps even "system under high load", right?
Correct.
I would vote in favour of pushing Docker 1.10 to Fedora 23, with some
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:17:20AM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Is it worth considering holding 1.10 back until Fedora24?
> We should do so by policy, if I understand correctly. This is not a
> compatible change and users can't easily roll back. We should freeze F23
> on 1.10, and the two-week
content-addressability-migration
>
> ----- Messaggio originale -
> | Da: "Joe Brockmeier" <j...@redhat.com>
> | A: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io
> | Inviato: Martedì, 9 febbraio 2016 14:24:32
> | Oggetto: Re: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10 into Fedo
Antonio Murdaca" <amurd...@redhat.com>
| Inviato: Martedì, 9 febbraio 2016 13:45:58
| Oggetto: Re: [atomic-devel] Concerns about pushing Docker 1.10 into Fedora23
|
| Hey Antonio, I remember discussing the migrator with you a while ago.
| Where did that end up? Can I see it/test
10 matches
Mail list logo
