On Fri, Oct 14, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Jason DeTiberus wrote:
> The other issue is that we don't require users to manage their
> environments with Ansible, so our temporary modifications would
> also need to be documented and implemented separately for non-
> Ansible users.
I see the point, but the tu
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Jason DeTiberus wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Right now we've got the tuned package in the base atomic content. There
>> are atomic-host and atomic-guest tuned profiles which are currently
>> identical to the ato
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Colin Walters
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 02:45 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
>>
>> Because layered products (not just OpenShift) do not want to be coupled
>> to the RHEL release schedule to update the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 02:45 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
>
> Because layered products (not just OpenShift) do not want to be coupled to
> the RHEL release schedule to update their profiles. They want to own their
> profiles and rely on the
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 02:45 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> Because layered products (not just OpenShift) do not want to be
> coupled to the RHEL release schedule to update their profiles. They
> want to own their profiles and rely on the tuned daemon to be there.
I see two aspects to this discussio
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 01:36 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
>
> Going fwd, I think we would rather not maintain two locations (atomic-*
> and atomic-openshift-* tuned profiles with identical content.
>
>
> Yes, agreed.
>
>
> So, trying to reason a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 01:36 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> Going fwd, I think we would rather not maintain two locations (atomic-
> * and atomic-openshift-* tuned profiles with identical content.
Yes, agreed.
>
> So, trying to reason a way to get those profiles onto an AH since we
> can't install t
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Scott Dodson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Jason DeTiberus
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Right now we've got the tuned package in the base atomic content. There
> >> are atomic-host
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Right now we've got the tuned package in the base atomic content. There
> are atomic-host and atomic-guest tuned profiles which are currently
> identical to the atomic-openshift ones. We'd like to make a change to the
> atomic-opensh
Hi,
Right now we've got the tuned package in the base atomic content. There
are atomic-host and atomic-guest tuned profiles which are currently
identical to the atomic-openshift ones. We'd like to make a change to the
atomic-openshift-node/master profiles (which are distributed with the
openshif
10 matches
Mail list logo