On 04/13/2016 05:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
- is there any roadmap or clear priorities, planed deadlines etc?
With respect to the RH product roadmap - we do have a public view of the
roadmap of what we are planning from a RH product release perspective.
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/rele
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> i see that the atomic devel list is very active many people working on
> many things and probably there are some clear directions and goals, but
> it's not really clear for outsiders. imho it'd be very useful to clarify
> a few things:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, at 07:42 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
> the question here is "centos atomic" a rebuild of "redhat atomic" or
> it's not that simple?
The current one that's promoted is the Core SIG rebuild, yes. I would
also like to put more effort behind the SIG work.
> the most important c
On 04/13/2016 04:53 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> - is the atomic project (mainly the centos part) is independent of
>> redhat atomic or it's just a rebuild of redhat atomic (similar to
>> redhat->centos).
>
> There are two aspects to CentOS, and indeed this is very confusing.
> See:
>
> https://wi
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 05:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> i see that the atomic devel list is very active many people working on
> many things and probably there are some clear directions and goals, but
> it's not really clear for outsiders. imho it'd be very useful to clarify
> a few things
hi,
i see that the atomic devel list is very active many people working on
many things and probably there are some clear directions and goals, but
it's not really clear for outsiders. imho it'd be very useful to clarify
a few things:
- is the atomic project (mainly the centos part) is independent
