Re: [ATrpms-users] /usr/bin/faad permission

2011-09-09 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 18:04 +0100, Simon Putt wrote: Just Installed this new package and the permissions are still wrong and faad cant run as permissions are [lemonzest@electronicbox ~]$ ls -al /usr/bin/faad -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 50104 Sep 5 09:44 /usr/bin/faad Re-thanks for that, the

Re: [ATrpms-users] /usr/bin/faad permission

2011-09-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 21:08 +1000, Steve Cliffe wrote: On 23/08/2011 9:01 PM, huyfuo wrote: I use scientificlinux6 and el6-i386 repo. Permission of /usr/bin/faad is 0644. Is this right? $ rpm -qpi ~/faad2-2.7-16.el6.i686.rpm $ ls -l usr/bin/faad -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 48636 Aug 22

Re: [ATrpms-users] /usr/bin/faad permission

2011-09-05 Thread Simon Putt
Just Installed this new package and the permissions are still wrong and faad cant run as permissions are [lemonzest@electronicbox ~]$ ls -al /usr/bin/faad -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 50104 Sep 5 09:44 /usr/bin/faad And I get permission denied when attempting to run. Lemonzest

[ATrpms-users] /usr/bin/faad permission

2011-08-23 Thread huyfuo
I use scientificlinux6 and el6-i386 repo. Permission of /usr/bin/faad is 0644. Is this right? $ rpm -qpi ~/faad2-2.7-16.el6.i686.rpm Name: faad2Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.7 Vendor: ATrpms.net Release : 16.el6

Re: [ATrpms-users] /usr/bin/faad permission

2011-08-23 Thread Steve Cliffe
No, the permissions are not right. I installed this a week or two ago on a CentOS 6 x86_64 box and had to do a chmod 755 /usr/bin/faad. Steve. On 23/08/2011 9:01 PM, huyfuo wrote: I use scientificlinux6 and el6-i386 repo. Permission of /usr/bin/faad is 0644. Is this right? $ rpm -qpi