Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-25 Thread O&M Ugarcina
Hello Guys , We have another small problem that has returned again . Today after installing some video files , I have noticed that mythmetadatalookup is not working , as I could not download any fan art or cover art or descriptions . This reminded me of the last time this happened last year .

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-24 Thread Collier Family
On 25/05/2013 5:27 AM, sdkovacs wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Collier Family mailto:judi...@bigpond.net.au>> wrote: On 24/05/2013 6:34 AM, sdkovacs wrote: It would be much appreciated if you could build VDPAU-enabled i686 packages. I already have a fronten

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-23 Thread Collier Family
On 24/05/2013 6:34 AM, sdkovacs wrote: It would be much appreciated if you could build VDPAU-enabled i686 packages. I already have a frontend running with it. They are running with latest nvidia drivers. I'll put them in dropbox this afternoon. Cheers Stephen _

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-23 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/23/2013 1:34 PM, sdkovacs wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Collier Family wrote: dropbox is https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/98547397/mythtv-0.26.0-294.el6.x86_64.t

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-23 Thread sdkovacs
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Collier Family wrote: > dropbox is https://dl.dropboxusercontent.**com/u/98547397/mythtv-0.26.0-** > 294.el6.x86_64.tgz > > Let me know if you want i686 ones > > It is easy enoungh to go

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:49:53PM +1000, Collier Family wrote: > >I compared the old and new 0.24.x builds and other than a newer nvidia > >lib packahes there are no striking changes. :( > This is the only change I can see that might effect it > 424a425,432 > > > > # Replace static lib paths with

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread Collier Family
dropbox is https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/98547397/mythtv-0.26.0-294.el6.x86_64.tgz Let me know if you want i686 ones It is easy enoungh to go back to 293 when it comes out. Cheers Stephen ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net h

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/22/2013 6:10 PM, judithc wrote: I posted the solution yesterday so Axel should be able to respin soon. If you need a fix straight away you could use the version I put in my Dropbox Stephen Sent from Samsung Mobile Would you please repost your dropbox link. Yes, I have one frontend tha

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread sdkovacs
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:45 PM, judithc wrote: > What arch are you using i686 or x86_64 there appears to be a problem with > 64 bit. > > > Sent from Samsung Mobile > > > I'm seeing that VDPAU is missing on the i686 builds as well. ___ atrpms-users mail

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread judithc
s.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms Yes, both frontends are x86_64. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:45 PM, judithc wrote: What arch are you using i686 or x86_64 there appears to be a problem with 64 bit. Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message F

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread Deyan Bektchiev
Bektchiev > Date: > To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" > Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms > > > What output are you using for your system? > > I upgraded my two frontends and found out that OpenGL, VDPAU and VAAPI are > missing from the builds. And

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread judithc
What arch are you using i686 or x86_64 there appears to be a problem with 64 bit. Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message From: Deyan Bektchiev Date: To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms What output are

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread Deyan Bektchiev
Sorry, I just saw that Axel had already answered that question yesterday and indeed VDPAU support was missing from the builds. I would be interested in finding out about OpenGL and VAAPI... On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Deyan Bektchiev wrote: > What output are you using for your system? > >

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-22 Thread Deyan Bektchiev
What output are you using for your system? I upgraded my two frontends and found out that OpenGL, VDPAU and VAAPI are missing from the builds. And it definitely used to work with 0.25... Deyan On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Steve Cliffe wrote: > I had been holding off for this and was getti

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread Collier Family
On 22/05/2013 11:54 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:45:37AM +1000, Collier Family wrote: On 22/05/2013 4:02 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/21/2013 10:41 AM, John Pilkington wrote: On 21/05/13 17:01, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/20/2013 10:25 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: I performed the less

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:45:37AM +1000, Collier Family wrote: > On 22/05/2013 4:02 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > > >On 5/21/2013 10:41 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > >>On 21/05/13 17:01, Kirk Bocek wrote: > >>> > >>>On 5/20/2013 10:25 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > I performed the less interesting

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread Collier Family
On 22/05/2013 4:02 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/21/2013 10:41 AM, John Pilkington wrote: On 21/05/13 17:01, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/20/2013 10:25 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: I performed the less interesting 0.24.3-283 to 0.24.3-284 refresh. Looks fine. Spoke too soon. One of my two front ends is

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/21/2013 10:41 AM, John Pilkington wrote: On 21/05/13 17:01, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/20/2013 10:25 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: I performed the less interesting 0.24.3-283 to 0.24.3-284 refresh. Looks fine. Spoke too soon. One of my two front ends is exhibiting jerky playback. This is my ultr

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread John Pilkington
On 21/05/13 17:01, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/20/2013 10:25 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: I performed the less interesting 0.24.3-283 to 0.24.3-284 refresh. Looks fine. Spoke too soon. One of my two front ends is exhibiting jerky playback. This is my ultra-thin Nvidia-ION box in the bedroom. The beefie

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/20/2013 10:25 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: I performed the less interesting 0.24.3-283 to 0.24.3-284 refresh. Looks fine. Spoke too soon. One of my two front ends is exhibiting jerky playback. This is my ultra-thin Nvidia-ION box in the bedroom. The beefier GT-430 box in the living room se

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread John Pilkington
On 21/05/13 13:39, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Collier Family mailto:judi...@bigpond.net.au>> wrote: On 21/05/2013 6:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: No, SL was eventually bit by the same problem, and the solution is still the same, downgrade qtwebkit to 2.0-3 (n

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Collier Family wrote: > On 21/05/2013 6:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > No, SL was eventually bit by the same problem, and the solution is still > the same, downgrade qtwebkit to 2.0-3 (not sure what the SL release > number is). > > Richard > > I'm running qtw

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-21 Thread Collier Family
On 21/05/2013 6:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: No, SL was eventually bit by the same problem, and the solution is still the same, downgrade qtwebkit to 2.0-3 (not sure what the SL release number is). Richard I'm running qtwebkit-2.1.1-1.el6.x86_64 with no issues on SL 6.3. What was the issue?

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John Pilkington wrote: > OK, perhaps you won't have that problem; but for anyone else who might be > tempted to try the kernel-lt route, I'm not sure if nvidia drivers are > available for it - although elrepo does have some packages that just might > be kernel-ver

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread John Pilkington
On 20/05/13 20:19, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/20/2013 12:05 PM, John Pilkington wrote: On 20/05/13 18:25, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/18/2013 2:15 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Actually there will also be fresh 0.25.x packages as well, even fresh 0.24.x. I'm not sure whether you have to update that way - thi

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/20/2013 12:05 PM, John Pilkington wrote: On 20/05/13 18:25, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/18/2013 2:15 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Actually there will also be fresh 0.25.x packages as well, even fresh 0.24.x. I'm not sure whether you have to update that way - this is something best asked on the mytht

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread John Pilkington
On 20/05/13 18:25, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 5/18/2013 2:15 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Actually there will also be fresh 0.25.x packages as well, even fresh 0.24.x. I'm not sure whether you have to update that way - this is something best asked on the mythtv-users list. I suspect you may update immediate

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/18/2013 2:15 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Actually there will also be fresh 0.25.x packages as well, even fresh 0.24.x. I'm not sure whether you have to update that way - this is something best asked on the mythtv-users list. I suspect you may update immediately to 0.26. Packages are uploaded no

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread Steve Cliffe
I had been holding off for this and was getting to the stage where I was contemplating building it from source and installing so this is good to hear. Steve. On 20/05/2013 11:25 PM, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi, Just upgraded to 0.26 yesterday build from atrpms, from 0.25 (old atrpms build) on F1

[ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread Kim Bisgaard
Hi, Just upgraded to 0.26 yesterday build from atrpms, from 0.25 (old atrpms build) on F17 - i386. It was a smooth upgrade - no problems at all:-) Nice to have Axel back. Thanks!! Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-18 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:14:15PM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > On 5/17/2013 12:42 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > >On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:17:40AM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: > >>I was wondering if I could I get an update on the possibility of > >>CentOS 6 packages for MythTV 0.26 showing up on ATrpms? I

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-17 Thread Kirk Bocek
On 5/17/2013 12:42 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:17:40AM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: I was wondering if I could I get an update on the possibility of CentOS 6 packages for MythTV 0.26 showing up on ATrpms? I've seen the traffic here with the builds outside of ATrpms. Is there a

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-17 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:17:40AM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: > I was wondering if I could I get an update on the possibility of > CentOS 6 packages for MythTV 0.26 showing up on ATrpms? I've seen > the traffic here with the builds outside of ATrpms. Is there a > technical issue of some sort? Yes, t

[ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 On ATrpms

2013-05-17 Thread Kirk Bocek
I was wondering if I could I get an update on the possibility of CentOS 6 packages for MythTV 0.26 showing up on ATrpms? I've seen the traffic here with the builds outside of ATrpms. Is there a technical issue of some sort? Thanks. ___ atrpms-users