Yeah, thats the new one im getting tonight. I just did:
rpm -Uvh
ftp://ftp.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/i386/kdepim-3.5.2-0.2.fc4.i386.rpm
so that yum would quit complaining about it.
Paul Wilson wrote:
> I'm getting these errors too, was there a resolution?
> I'm assuming
I'm getting these errors too, was there a resolution?
I'm assuming its with atrpms///
yum update command output:
=
Package Arch Version RepositorySize
=
On 5/15/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:01:03AM -0500, Noel Leistad - atrpms wrote:
> > Axel Thimm wrote:
> >
> > >>>rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/*repo
> > >>>rpm -Vf /etc/yum.repos.d/*repo
> > >>>
> > >>Be gentle with me...I'm new at this.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:01:03AM -0500, Noel Leistad - atrpms wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> >>>rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/*repo
> >>>rpm -Vf /etc/yum.repos.d/*repo
> >>>
> >>Be gentle with me...I'm new at this.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >According to the above all files have been modified. The "S.5
Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/*repo
>>>rpm -Vf /etc/yum.repos.d/*repo
>>>
>>Be gentle with me...I'm new at this.
>>
>>
>
>According to the above all files have been modified. The "S.5T"
>means that
>
>o the size has changed
>o the md5sum has changed (the contents)
>o the ti
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:58:52PM -0500, Brink Tastee wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:25:40PM -0500, Brink Tastee wrote:
> > > On 5/12/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:58:58AM -0500, hondaman wrot
On 5/12/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:25:40PM -0500, Brink Tastee wrote:
> > On 5/12/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:58:58AM -0500, hondaman wrote:
> > > > I did rm -rf /var/cache/yum/* , yum clean all, yet I still
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:25:40PM -0500, Brink Tastee wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:58:58AM -0500, hondaman wrote:
> > > I did rm -rf /var/cache/yum/* , yum clean all, yet I still get this error:
> >
> > What's your definition for the upd
On 5/12/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:58:58AM -0500, hondaman wrote:
> > I did rm -rf /var/cache/yum/* , yum clean all, yet I still get this error:
>
> What's your definition for the updates channel? E.g. what does yum
> output at the very beginning when it
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:58:58AM -0500, hondaman wrote:
> I did rm -rf /var/cache/yum/* , yum clean all, yet I still get this error:
What's your definition for the updates channel? E.g. what does yum
output at the very beginning when it downloads the metadata?
At the very least the freshrpms en
I did rm -rf /var/cache/yum/* , yum clean all, yet I still get this error:
(1/2): dhcdbd-1.14-1.FC4. 100% |=| 66 kB
00:00
http://dl.atrpms.net/fc4-i386/redhat/updates/dhcdbd-1.14-1.FC4.i386.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
http:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:31:22PM -0500, john bray wrote:
> > > Downloading Packages:
> > > (1/42): libtiff-3.7.4-5.i 100% |=| 317 kB00:01
> > > (2/42): mono-data-1.1.13. 100% |=| 1.7 MB00:05
> > > http://dl.atrpms.net/fc5-i386/redhat/updates
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 21:15 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:54:48PM -0400, Gary McClellan wrote:
> > I did a 'yum clean all' and then a 'yum update':
>
> From yum's manpage:
>
>yum clean all
> Runs yum clean packages and yum clean headers as above.
>
>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:54:48PM -0400, Gary McClellan wrote:
> I did a 'yum clean all' and then a 'yum update':
From yum's manpage:
yum clean all
Runs yum clean packages and yum clean headers as above.
It still keeps dbcache, cache and metadata. When I suggested resetting
On 5/11/06, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you try resetting your local yum cache and try again? You'resubscribed to so many mirrors that it is now impossible to make out theone passing in the inconsistent checksums.Hmmm. For what it's worth, Smart had no problem with handling the upda
I did a 'yum clean all' and then a 'yum update':Downloading Packages:(1/42): libtiff-3.7.4-5.i 100% |=| 317 kB 00:01(2/42): mono-data-1.1.13. 100% |=| 1.7 MB 00:05
http://dl.atrpms.net/fc5-i386/redhat/updates/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm:
Could you try resetting your local yum cache and try again? You're
subscribed to so many mirrors that it is now impossible to make out the
one passing in the inconsistent checksums.
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:39:12PM -0400, Gary McClellan wrote:
> I am also seeing this behaviour.
>
> (1/26): mono
I am also seeing this behaviour.(1/26): mono-data-1.1.13. 100% |=| 1.7 MB 00:05http://dl.atrpms.net/fc5-i386/redhat/updates/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm
: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksumTrying other mirror.http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/5/i386/upd
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:06:33PM -0500, hondaman wrote:
> For Fedora, the following packages seem to be having problems. Notice
> that there are 3 different versions of FC involved.
>
> ghostscript-8.15.2-1.1.i386.rpm
> kdebase-3.5.2-0.3.fc5.i386.rpm
> dhcdbd-1.14-1.FC5.i386.rpm
> dhcdbd-1.14-
For Fedora, the following packages seem to be having problems. Notice
that there are 3 different versions of FC involved.
ghostscript-8.15.2-1.1.i386.rpm
kdebase-3.5.2-0.3.fc5.i386.rpm
dhcdbd-1.14-1.FC5.i386.rpm
dhcdbd-1.14-1.FC4.x86_64.rpm
xterm-212-1.FC4.x86_64.rpm
xterm-212-1.FC4.i386.rpm
bin
20 matches
Mail list logo
