Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision

2014-08-18 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, > Now if you have some foo.tex in some directory sd/ containing some > \usepackage{foo} you will have an AUCTeX style "foo" that will load two > hooks: > * one from auctex/styles/foo.el, and > * one from sd/auto/foo.el Just to complete, it'll also load ~/

Re: [AUCTeX] Small optimizations / was: Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision

2014-08-18 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, > Just to take things one by one, I amended the small optimization > contribution in the first place after your comment that assoc-string > is not XEmacs-compatible Thanks. > I used a defalias to fallback to assoc in the case of XEmacs. Hopefully > defalias

Re: [AUCTeX] Small optimizations / was: Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision

2014-08-18 Thread Tassilo Horn
Hi Vincent, sorry, I've forgotten to mention in my last mail that the patch won't apply cleanly. Looking at the diff for ChangeLog, it seems it's based on some quite old version. Could you update it to apply on the current git head, please? It also contains trailing whitespace which it shouldn'

Re: [AUCTeX] Small optimizations / was: Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision

2014-08-18 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Good night Tassilo, > From: t...@gnu.org > To: vincent@hotmail.fr > CC: auctex@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Small optimizations / was: Problem with latex2e style hook --- > LaTeX/Texinfo collision > Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:24:29 +0200 > > Hi Vincent, > > sorry, I've forgotten to mention in my las

Re: [AUCTeX] Small optimizations / was: Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision

2014-08-18 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, >> sorry, I've forgotten to mention in my last mail that the patch won't >> apply cleanly. Looking at the diff for ChangeLog, it seems it's based >> on some quite old version. Could you update it to apply on the >> current git head, please? > > Done (see atta