Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Moving across formulas

Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2015-11-07, at 09:31, Julien Cubizolles wrote: > >> Marcin Borkowski writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm slowly (very slowly, I have a lot of other things to do now...) >>> working on my AUCTeX enhancements.

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] a strange problem with pretty symbols and qquad

>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> | Composed with the following character(s) "qquad" by the rule: >> | (?⧢) >> | The component character(s) are displayed by these fonts (glyph codes): >> | ⧢:

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Moving across formulas

On 2015-11-07, at 10:46, Julien Cubizolles wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> On 2015-11-07, at 09:31, Julien Cubizolles wrote: >> >>> Marcin Borkowski writes: >>> Hi all, I'm slowly (very slowly,

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Moving across formulas

On 2015-11-04, at 09:24, Nicolas Richard wrote: > Hi Marcin, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: >> No it doesn't. I discovered this today. This is a perfectly valid >> formula, for which forward-sexp doesn't work: $(0,1\rangle$. > > I worked around it by

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Moving across formulas

On 2015-11-03, at 23:02, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi Marcin, > > 2015-10-29 22:54 GMT+01:00 Marcin Borkowski : >> Hi all, >> >> I'm slowly (very slowly, I have a lot of other things to do now...) >> working on my AUCTeX enhancements. One thing I'd like to have is to

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Moving across formulas

Marcin Borkowski writes: > Hi all, > > I'm slowly (very slowly, I have a lot of other things to do now...) > working on my AUCTeX enhancements. One thing I'd like to have is to be > able to move to the end (or beginning) of a formula. I.e., in one of > these situations: > >

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Moving across formulas

On 2015-11-07, at 09:31, Julien Cubizolles wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm slowly (very slowly, I have a lot of other things to do now...) >> working on my AUCTeX enhancements. One thing I'd like to have is to be >> able to move

[AUCTeX-devel] feature freeze in GNU emacs 25.

Hi That might be a bit off topic, but currently there is a discussion on emacs.devel which features to freeze for the 25.1 release. The nifty pretty-symbol stuff is already in, I trust?? Uwe Brauer ___ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Contributing to AUCTeX

Hi Marcin, 2015-11-07 20:14 GMT+01:00 Marcin Borkowski : > OK, > > so after some time dedicated to thinking I signed the FSF papers and > sent them (of course, it will take some time for the letter to get > across the pond, and FSF will probably need at least a few days to >

[AUCTeX-devel] Contributing to AUCTeX

OK, so after some time dedicated to thinking I signed the FSF papers and sent them (of course, it will take some time for the letter to get across the pond, and FSF will probably need at least a few days to register it). So, my question now is: what do I do in order to start contributing to

Re: [AUCTeX] Patch to tex-info.el to support node name completion in @..ref commands, and solve a few other pbs

Hi Vincent, 2015-10-25 21:15 GMT+01:00 Vincent Belaïche : > Dear AUCTeX experts, > > I would like to submit to you the attached patch. > > [...] XEmacs doesn't have `assoc-string', is it possible to use `assoc' or there was a strong reason for using `assoc-string'