Re: [AUCTeX] Repeat TeX-command-run-all without buffer change

Hi Mosè, * Mosè Giordano: 06.05.2017 (17:39): [...] > If you believe that sometimes `TeX-command-default' fails to > detect a necessary command, please share this situation so that we can > improve its logic. thanks for your response, this is simple example for this situation, it's from the

bug#26694: preview-at-point fails on very long lines with "End of buffer"

Hi Frank, 2017-04-28 15:26 GMT+02:00 Frank Fischer : > However, I would say the the column offset is just wrong. Either > subtract the length of the preceding text (in the original buffer) from > the column number or copy the preceding text to the temp buffer as

[AUCTeX-commit] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. f4723786f2d2ec58bdb94bd8112f6437f33c1d36

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via f4723786f2d2ec58bdb94bd8112f6437f33c1d36 (commit) from

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. f4723786f2d2ec58bdb94bd8112f6437f33c1d36

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via f4723786f2d2ec58bdb94bd8112f6437f33c1d36 (commit) from

Re: [AUCTeX] Repeat TeX-command-run-all without buffer change

Hi Thorsten, 2017-05-04 15:19 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Grothe : > Hi list, > > the command TeX-command-run-all sometimes not detects that another latex > run is necessary. That's no problem one could hit C-c C-a again, but this > does only work for me if the buffer changes (add a

Re: [AUCTeX] How to configure TeX special characters?

Hi Marcin, I tend to agree with David, fontification in AUCTeX is known to fail at some point when too many catcodes are changed. Sophisticated LaTeX style files are not so nicely displayed by AUCTeX. It would be awesome to make this more configurable, the problem is that this is *a lot* of

Re: [AUCTeX] CTAN Upload: preview

Hello Arash, thanks for this upload with the revised date: On Saturday 06 May 2017 at 12:36:30 +0200 CTAN Portal Service (no-re...@ctan.org) wrote: > Upload information: > Package:preview > Summary:Extract bits of a LaTeX source for output > Version:11.90 2017-04-24 >

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] insert a label with the file name as suffix.

>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Brauer writes: >> Uwe Brauer writes: >> Hmm, I can't reproduce what you describe. I started Emacs, eval'ed the >> above code in scratch buffer, opened test-exam.tex like this: >> \documentclass[answers]{exam} >>

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] insert a label with the file name as suffix.

> Uwe Brauer writes: > Hmm, I can't reproduce what you describe. I started Emacs, eval'ed the > above code in scratch buffer, opened test-exam.tex like this: > \documentclass[answers]{exam} > \begin{document} > \begin{questions} >

[AUCTeX-commit] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 0e4ad85b8998f3898e218045e3215d21c46a3484

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via 0e4ad85b8998f3898e218045e3215d21c46a3484 (commit) from

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 0e4ad85b8998f3898e218045e3215d21c46a3484

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via 0e4ad85b8998f3898e218045e3215d21c46a3484 (commit) from

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] insert a label with the file name as suffix.

Uwe Brauer writes: > > Uwe Brauer writes: > > > Sigh, sorry, my bad. `LaTeX-exam-label' is not defined at that point of > > time. Please try this: > > > (with-eval-after-load "latex" > > (add-to-list 'LaTeX-label-alist '("titledquestion"