Hi both of you,
> > in the long run I could use both, but ATM the most straightforward way
> > for me would be to package from a git tag, especially if I could use
> > git archive to get a orig.tar.gz.
In this case, both the current stable release tags, as well as the
hopefully to be done elpa
Hi Davide,
2017-07-22 2:55 GMT+02:00 Davide G. M. Salvetti :
>> MG == Mosè Giordano [2017-7-21]
>
> [...]
>
> MG> We have the Debian maintainer reading us :-) Davide, do you think
> MG> you'd be able in the future to prepare the Debian package from a git
> MG> tag or an
> MG == Mosè Giordano [2017-7-21]
[...]
MG> We have the Debian maintainer reading us :-) Davide, do you think
MG> you'd be able in the future to prepare the Debian package from a git
MG> tag or an ELPA package?
Hi everybody,
in the long run I could use both, but ATM the most
Lance Drager wrote (Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:30:50PM -0500):
> This is an emacs question, but someone on this list should know how
> to do it.
>
> On some machines I'm working with, unneeded menu bar icons push the
> AuC-TeX icons to the pull-down tail of the menu bar. How do you
> customize the
> Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Keita,
> Looks good, and they're also only stylistic changes, so should be safe
> to include them right now. Go ahead and install the patch ;-)
Done. This is my first time to use `prog2' in a meaningful way :-)
Bye,
Ikumi Keita
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 41f229d47d9b276c7ea9141199dfdade19c6dd10 (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 41f229d47d9b276c7ea9141199dfdade19c6dd10 (commit)
from
Hi Norbert,
first of all, thanks for raising the issue of the important bugfix
missing in a stable release. Lately the development of AUCTeX slowed
down and rolling a new release went outside my radar.
2017-07-21 3:31 GMT+02:00 Norbert Preining :
> Hi Mosè
>
>> In addition,
Hi Keita,
2017-07-21 9:13 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita :
> Hi all,
>
>> Mosè Giordano writes:
>> Dear all,
>> the latest stable release of AUCTeX doesn't include the fix for the
>> parsing of TeX Live 2017 logs (see
>>
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via cf92c47c83fc58c583bbe167d5d7e88f092c9f03 (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via cf92c47c83fc58c583bbe167d5d7e88f092c9f03 (commit)
from
Hi all,
> Mosè Giordano writes:
> Dear all,
> the latest stable release of AUCTeX doesn't include the fix for the
> parsing of TeX Live 2017 logs (see
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex/2017-04/msg7.html), so
> now that TeX Live 2017 has been release it's a good
12 matches
Mail list logo