Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs

Hi all, > Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi all, > I'm resurrecting this thread to raise again the question: > Is there anyone with strong arguments against dropping support in > AUCTeX for all Emacsen whose version is < 24 (thus including all > versions of XEmacs)? I don't

Re: [AUCTeX] Wrong commands in Chicago style reftex prompt

Le 19/09/2017 à 12:28, Mosè Giordano a écrit : > 2017-09-17 16:32 GMT+02:00 Pétùr : >> 1. Is biblatex.el removed from the choice of styles in Reftex Cite >> Format? I don't see it anymore. > No, it's still there: >

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs

> Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi all, I'm resurrecting this thread to raise again the question: > Is there anyone with strong arguments against dropping support > in AUCTeX for all Emacsen whose version is < 24 (thus including > all versions of XEmacs)? >

Re: [AUCTeX] Wrong commands in Chicago style reftex prompt

Hi Pétùr, 2017-09-17 16:32 GMT+02:00 Pétùr : > Hello everyone, > > 1. Is biblatex.el removed from the choice of styles in Reftex Cite > Format? I don't see it anymore. No, it's still there:

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] support for xemacs

Hi all, I'm resurrecting this thread to raise again the question: Is there anyone with strong arguments against dropping support in AUCTeX for all Emacsen whose version is < 24 (thus including all versions of XEmacs)? Keep in mind that supporting old platforms requires time, so in case