Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

> NP == Norbert Preining [2017-7-22] NP> Combining what you two said, it seems that the easiest way forward for NP> you (upstream) and not too disturbing for downstream to stop doing NP> whatever "tarball releases" you are doing, and we consider the NP> elpa releases as "the releases" which

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

Hi both of you, > > in the long run I could use both, but ATM the most straightforward way > > for me would be to package from a git tag, especially if I could use > > git archive to get a orig.tar.gz. In this case, both the current stable release tags, as well as the hopefully to be done elpa

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

Hi Davide, 2017-07-22 2:55 GMT+02:00 Davide G. M. Salvetti : >> MG == Mosè Giordano [2017-7-21] > > [...] > > MG> We have the Debian maintainer reading us :-) Davide, do you think > MG> you'd be able in the future to prepare the Debian package from a git > MG> tag or an

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

> MG == Mosè Giordano [2017-7-21] [...] MG> We have the Debian maintainer reading us :-) Davide, do you think MG> you'd be able in the future to prepare the Debian package from a git MG> tag or an ELPA package? Hi everybody, in the long run I could use both, but ATM the most

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

> Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Keita, > Looks good, and they're also only stylistic changes, so should be safe > to include them right now. Go ahead and install the patch ;-) Done. This is my first time to use `prog2' in a meaningful way :-) Bye, Ikumi Keita

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

Hi Norbert, first of all, thanks for raising the issue of the important bugfix missing in a stable release. Lately the development of AUCTeX slowed down and rolling a new release went outside my radar. 2017-07-21 3:31 GMT+02:00 Norbert Preining : > Hi Mosè > >> In addition,

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

Hi Keita, 2017-07-21 9:13 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita : > Hi all, > >> Mosè Giordano writes: >> Dear all, >> the latest stable release of AUCTeX doesn't include the fix for the >> parsing of TeX Live 2017 logs (see >>

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

Hi all, > Mosè Giordano writes: > Dear all, > the latest stable release of AUCTeX doesn't include the fix for the > parsing of TeX Live 2017 logs (see > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex/2017-04/msg7.html), so > now that TeX Live 2017 has been release it's a good

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

Hi Mosè > AUCTeX 11.91. Is there any other quick change that you would like to > see into this version? Not from my side. > In addition, Norbert Preining expressed[1] the wish to see more > synchronization between ELPA releases and stable releases, because Not necessarily! I leave this to the

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

On 7/20/2017 7:13 AM, Tamas Papp wrote: On Thu, Jul 20 2017, Mosè Giordano wrote: I'd like to cooperate as much as possible with downstream distributors, but I'm not sure about what's the best way to do it: * start tagging and releasing bug-fix versions also in the main repository (not only

Re: [AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

On Thu, Jul 20 2017, Mosè Giordano wrote: > I'd like to cooperate as much as possible with downstream > distributors, but I'm not sure about what's the best way to do it: > > * start tagging and releasing bug-fix versions also in the main > repository (not only in ELPA)? > * continue to not

[AUCTeX] Preparing new AUCTeX version and comments about more frequent releases

Dear all, the latest stable release of AUCTeX doesn't include the fix for the parsing of TeX Live 2017 logs (see https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex/2017-04/msg7.html), so now that TeX Live 2017 has been release it's a good idea to release AUCTeX 11.91. Is there any other quick change