[AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/preview/circ.tex

2005-05-25 Thread David Kastrup
Index: auctex/preview/circ.tex diff -u auctex/preview/circ.tex:1.9 auctex/preview/circ.tex:1.10 --- auctex/preview/circ.tex:1.9 Sun Apr 10 16:28:59 2005 +++ auctex/preview/circ.tex Wed May 25 21:30:55 2005 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Da $d$ stets eine ganze Zahl ist, ist dies wieder zu $d < 0$ equivale

[AUCTeX-commit] auctex/preview circ.tex ChangeLog

2005-05-25 Thread David Kastrup
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/auctex Module name:auctex Branch: Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/05/25 21:30:55 Modified files: preview: circ.tex ChangeLog Log message: (section{Die gerade Linie}): Make the intentional errors more

[AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/preview/ChangeLog

2005-05-25 Thread David Kastrup
Index: auctex/preview/ChangeLog diff -u auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.789 auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.790 --- auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.789 Mon May 23 23:11:02 2005 +++ auctex/preview/ChangeLogWed May 25 21:30:55 2005 @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2005-05-25 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + *

[AUCTeX-devel] feature proposal: enhance change-log features

2005-05-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hello I apologise for this subject which might be a little off topic. I lately use a lot of add-change-log-entry. Now for (La)tex files, the entry in the log file will make reference to the section in which the change took place. My question is couldn't that be enhanced in order to include also e

[AUCTeX-commit] auctex/doc auctex.texi

2005-05-25 Thread Ralf Angeli
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/auctex Module name:auctex Branch: Changes by: Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/05/25 16:44:46 Modified files: doc: auctex.texi Log message: (Checking): A user should not (have to) edit tex.el to switch from lacheck t

[AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/doc/auctex.texi

2005-05-25 Thread Ralf Angeli
Index: auctex/doc/auctex.texi diff -u auctex/doc/auctex.texi:1.227 auctex/doc/auctex.texi:1.228 --- auctex/doc/auctex.texi:1.227Thu Apr 28 14:31:25 2005 +++ auctex/doc/auctex.texi Wed May 25 16:44:45 2005 @@ -2227,12 +2227,11 @@ It is much more configurable than @code{lacheck}, but do

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure

2005-05-25 Thread David Kastrup
Evil Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Evil Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Will respond to the rest later, but for now, I seem to have >> autoconf 2.54. Is that too old? > > I looked around and apparently I already has 2.59b installed, but > not in my path. I tried it with that and th