* Tassilo Horn (2012-11-09) writes:
> I think it's time to roll a new AUCTeX release.
I think so, too. However, I've yet to check the Biber patch. There is
at least one thing about it I don't like and that is the renaming of
existing defcustoms. This would break the setup of users with existin
"giordano.m...@libero.it" writes:
Hi Mosè,
> I wrote AUCTeX style files for `bm' and `siunitx' packages, you can find them
> here:
> https://raw.github.com/giordano/auctex-styles/master/bm.el
> https://raw.github.com/giordano/auctex-styles/master/siunitx.el
Looks good.
> `TeX-auto-generate' f
David Kastrup writes:
>> The xemacs-package target seems to work, but it byte-compiles the
>> files with emacs (I don't have xemacs installed). Probably, files
>> compiled with emacs 24 won't run on XEmacs, right? How would I tell
>> it to use XEmacs if I had installed it? Re-configuring with
Tassilo Horn writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it's time to roll a new AUCTeX release. I've tried out the
> release procedure documented in the Makefile. I omitted the
> release-commit target and used TAG=2012-11-09 (you can use tags and
> dates).
>
> The normal dist target creating the tarball and
Hi all,
I think it's time to roll a new AUCTeX release. I've tried out the
release procedure documented in the Makefile. I omitted the
release-commit target and used TAG=2012-11-09 (you can use tags and
dates).
The normal dist target creating the tarball and zip distribution work
fine.
The xem
