Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

2015-08-24 Thread Uwe Brauer
2015-08-23 22:50 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es: Speaking for myself, I don't like code disappearing. Instead I like AUCTeX' approach: {sub,super}scripts are rendered as such but ^ and _ (and braces) are still there. Usually I agree, but in this specific case, I prefer to not see ^

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, simplify-TeX-parse-error, updated. 7279f82aac4e666532d5ee2a0df4350e7a48c8be

2015-08-24 Thread Tassilo Horn
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU AUCTeX. The branch, simplify-TeX-parse-error has been updated via 7279f82aac4e666532d5ee2a0df4350e7a48c8be (commit) via

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

2015-08-24 Thread Tassilo Horn
Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es writes: I just found out that latex-pretty-symbols.el provides, at first glance, basically the same features as x-symbol-mode. Just for the record: I've just added `prettify-symbols-mode' support for (La)TeX to Emacs' built-in tex-mode.el. If you run a very, very

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 30be9cca33b2dc810cb2eeef214980734f5751b1

2015-08-24 Thread Tassilo Horn
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU AUCTeX. The branch, master has been updated via 30be9cca33b2dc810cb2eeef214980734f5751b1 (commit) from

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

2015-08-24 Thread Mosè Giordano
2015-08-24 9:24 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es: 2015-08-23 22:50 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es: Speaking for myself, I don't like code disappearing. Instead I like AUCTeX' approach: {sub,super}scripts are rendered as such but ^ and _ (and braces) are still there. Usually I

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Implementing TeX-update

2015-08-24 Thread Mosè Giordano
2015-08-17 12:26 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org: Hi list, I've implemented TeX-update, as suggested in the wishlist. My work follows the same logic of http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/TN#toc8 and is in part based on it: a function runs the compilation command and calls a sentinel which,

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

2015-08-24 Thread Uwe Brauer
Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es writes: Just for the record: I've just added `prettify-symbols-mode' support for (La)TeX to Emacs' built-in tex-mode.el. If you run a very, very recent emacs, you could activate that in AUCTeX using 21.4.1 is recent enough? (setq-local

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

2015-08-24 Thread David Kastrup
Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es writes: Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es writes: Just for the record: I've just added `prettify-symbols-mode' support for (La)TeX to Emacs' built-in tex-mode.el. If you run a very, very recent emacs, you could activate that in AUCTeX using 21.4.1 is

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

2015-08-24 Thread Mosè Giordano
2015-08-24 18:35 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es: Actually you don't need to issue `TeX-fold-clearout-buffer' before `TeX-fold-buffer', but this isn't the point. IIUC, you'd prefer automatic folding as you type, right? That is correct but maybe this is very resource consuming? I think

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

2015-08-24 Thread Uwe Brauer
2015-08-24 9:24 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es: I see, but with `latex-pretty-symbol' only ^{1} is prettified, not ^{12} for example, in my opinion its utility is limited. This is true. X-symbol however with a completely different implementation will prettify even constructions like

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH] Various patches

2015-08-24 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Arash, 2015-08-24 22:49 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati esb...@gmx.de: Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: Hi Mosè, 2015-08-22 12:13 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati esb...@gmx.de: As always, any comments welcome. I reviewed your patches, they're overall fine, as usual, I have only a minor concern about

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH] Various patches

2015-08-24 Thread Arash Esbati
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: Hi Mosè, 2015-08-22 12:13 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati esb...@gmx.de: As always, any comments welcome. I reviewed your patches, they're overall fine, as usual, I have only a minor concern about captionbox: for the label you could simply call