Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How to check whether makeindex should be rerun?

Hi Tassilo, 2015-09-02 10:36 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn : > Mosè Giordano writes: > >> differently from what it's said in section 1.3.2.1 of the manual, >> AUCTeX never suggests to run makeindex when needed. Does someone know >> how can we check whether we need to run

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Implementing TeX-update

Hi Tassilo, 2015-09-02 7:58 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn : > I like Ivan's suggestions. Basically, the command is something like > "make all", so how about either `TeX-make-all', `TeX-execute-all', > `TeX-command-all', or `TeX-compile-all'? The binding C-c C-a would make > sense for all

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How to check whether makeindex should be rerun?

Mosè Giordano writes: > differently from what it's said in section 1.3.2.1 of the manual, > AUCTeX never suggests to run makeindex when needed. Does someone know > how can we check whether we need to run makeindex? The .idx file is > rewritten after every latex run, so it's

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Implementing TeX-update

Mosè Giordano writes: >> Well, what's missing is that the region file needs to be updated >> before doing that but I don't have time to do that. > > Uhm, I'll try to have a look at this, but I don't know when. I think we should extract the `TeX-region-create' call in

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Implementing TeX-update

> 2015-08-17 12:26 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano : > No comment? :-) Sorry to arrive late on this discussion. Off-topic question to start with, where is the «wishlist» you mentioned? Let me see whether I understand the philosophy. Usually I run C-c C-c and then I will be

[AUCTeX-devel] prettify-symbols-mode and the documentation.

Hi Maybe after some days of testing we should add an entry to the feature list, http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/features.html describing the new feature? Uwe Brauer ___ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] prettify-symbols-mode and the documentation.

Hi Uwe, 2015-09-02 17:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer : > Hi > > Maybe after some days of testing we should add an entry to the feature > list, http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/features.html > describing the new feature? That makes sense, but we should release the new version of

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Implementing TeX-update

Hi Uwe, 2015-09-02 17:56 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer : > >> 2015-08-17 12:26 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano : > >> No comment? :-) > > Sorry to arrive late on this discussion. Off-topic question to start > with, where is the «wishlist» you mentioned? In our manual (info

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)

>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: > Hi Uwe, >> I have the above setting >> (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode) >> >> however when I open a LaTeX file the symbols are not prettified I have >> to

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How to check whether makeindex should be rerun?

Mosè Giordano writes: >> BTW, it just occurred to me that I got this warning when compiling my >> document: >> >> LaTeX Warning: Index entries may have changed. While keeping the aux-files >> rerun >> both LaTeX and makeindex to get index entries right. >> >> This is with

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, simplify-TeX-parse-error, updated. 4953229027702c721de9d6a65688766844cc1423

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, simplify-TeX-parse-error has been updated via 4953229027702c721de9d6a65688766844cc1423 (commit) via

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 66b97ff2b71ca9ed13e691dbc9b51b0f418f183b

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via 66b97ff2b71ca9ed13e691dbc9b51b0f418f183b (commit) from

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)

On 09/02/2015 12:52 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: Tassilo Horn writes: > I see several ways to fix this: > > 1. Remove `font-latex-setup' from `latex-mode-hook' in >`VirTeX-common-initialization'. I mean, then we know that the user >uses AUCTeX's

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)

Uwe Brauer writes: >> I just wanted do debug this issue but with the Emacs copy as of right >> now (commit 4a703c73305211c780307e3654969ac1a20fb229) I can't reproduce >> it anymore. With the above add-hook, symbols are instantly prettified >> when opening some

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)

Tassilo Horn writes: > I see several ways to fix this: > > 1. Remove `font-latex-setup' from `latex-mode-hook' in >`VirTeX-common-initialization'. I mean, then we know that the user >uses AUCTeX's modes and not the built-in ones. > > 2. Don't add `font-latex-setup' to

[AUCTeX-devel] [yes and no] (was: (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode))

> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: > Tassilo Horn writes: > I've implemented fix 2 now. We'll see if that causes misery but I don't > think so. I will attach two files. File ne2.tex contains an integral and there indeed the integral is presented as a symbol,

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [the evil \usepackage{comment}]

On 09/02/2015 02:53 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: Uwe Brauer writes: >> I've implemented fix 2 now. We'll see if that causes misery but I don't >> think so. > > If I have the line \usepackage{comment} in my latex file, > turn-on-prettify-symbol-mode