Rasmus writes:
>>> IMHO:
>>> ‘␣’ OPEN BOX
>>
>> Ok, I've committed a patch which makes \quad display as ␣.
>
> I use this one for \qquad: '⧢' SHUFFLE PRODUCT.
Nice, I've added that to Emacs, too.
Bye,
Tassilo
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-d
Uwe Brauer writes:
Hi!
> Could \varrho please included in the prettify-symbol-list?
>
> ("\\varrho" . ?ϱ)
Done.
> BTW, is there anyway to display \qquad as
>
> ("\\qquad" . ?␣␣)
No. prettify-symbols can display symbols as one single char.
> When I tried this setting
Hello
Could \varrho please included in the prettify-symbol-list?
("\\varrho" . ?ϱ)
BTW, is there anyway to display \qquad as
("\\qquad" . ?␣␣)
When I tried this setting an error was indicated.
Uwe Brauer
___
auctex-dev
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>
>> Indeed, I can reproduce this. When I add a space before the _ in the
>> last equation and remove it again, it becomes invisible. With the
>> equation in the middle, I can't trigger that. Not sure what's the
>> problem. I'll have to debug this.
>
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Indeed, I can reproduce this. When I add a space before the _ in the
> last equation and remove it again, it becomes invisible. With the
> equation in the middle, I can't trigger that. Not sure what's the
> problem. I'll have to debug this.
Found it! It is the label!
Uwe Brauer writes:
> I attach a screenshot and the original LaTeX file:
>
> Some of the sub and super indices are invisible others not.
Indeed, I can reproduce this. When I add a space before the _ in the
last equation and remove it again, it becomes invisible. With the
equation in the middle,
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Me, too. ;-)
> You could limit the costs on our side by trying to reproduce your
> problems without your customizations or only with the minimal
> configurations needed before filing AUCTeX bug reports.
Point taken for the report concerning the auctex bin
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Me neither. When I eval the above, find a latex file, and then hit
>> I get
>
>> command-execute: Wrong type argument: commandp, my-turn-bidi-on
>
>> so the binding is effective, I just don't have your `my-turn-bidi-on'
>> defined here.
>
> I am almost convinced that thi
> Mosè Giordano writes:
> Me neither. When I eval the above, find a latex file, and then hit
> I get
> command-execute: Wrong type argument: commandp, my-turn-bidi-on
> so the binding is effective, I just don't have your `my-turn-bidi-on'
> defined here.
I am almost convinced that this pr
2015-09-15 15:55 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn :
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
> Indeed, \quad is displayed as a whitespace. That's kinda right
> because it produces a whitespace as wide as the letter m but of
> course it's probably inconvenient when editing.
> Hm, what
Mosè Giordano writes:
>>>> Indeed, \quad is displayed as a whitespace. That's kinda right
>>>> because it produces a whitespace as wide as the letter m but of
>>>> course it's probably inconvenient when editing.
>>>
>>>> Hm, what would you prefer instead?
>>>
>>>> ‘␠’ SYMB
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> 2015-09-15 12:34 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>> Hello
>>
>>
>> I am currently facing two problems:
>>
>>
>> - I always thought that local-key-binding via hook replaces the
>> global-key-binding (at least so it is in Xemacs) now in GNU Emacs I
>> have
>>
Hi Tassilo,
2015-09-15 14:13 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn :
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>
>>> Indeed, \quad is displayed as a whitespace. That's kinda right
>>> because it produces a whitespace as wide as the letter m but of
>>> course it's probably inconvenient when editing.
>>
>>> Hm, what
Hello
I attach a screenshot and the original LaTeX file:
Some of the sub and super indices are invisible others not.
Uwe Brauer
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\newcommand*{\setR}{\mathbb{R}}
% (setq font-latex-fontify-script 'invisible)
% (setq font-latex-fontify-script nil)
% (setq font-latex
Mosè Giordano writes:
>> (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'my-latex-mode-key)
>>
>> (defun my-latex-mode-key ()
>> "Setting of the following keys"
>> (interactive)
>> (local-set-key [(control right)] 'my-turn-bidi-on)
>> (local-set-key [(control left)] 'my-turn-bidi-off)
>> (local-set-key [(f
> Hi Uwe,
> 2015-09-15 12:34 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> I can't reproduce your problem in Emacs 24.5 (and I don't think this
> bug, if exists, has anything to do with AUCTeX).
> If I know map name, I usually set local keys with
> (eval-after-load "latex"
> '(progn
> (define-key LaTeX-mode-
Tassilo Horn writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>
>>> Indeed, \quad is displayed as a whitespace. That's kinda right
>>> because it produces a whitespace as wide as the letter m but of
>>> course it's probably inconvenient when editing.
>>
>>> Hm, what would you prefer instead?
>>
>>
> Hi Uwe,
> 2015-09-15 12:34 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> I can't reproduce your problem in Emacs 24.5 (and I don't think this
> bug, if exists, has anything to do with AUCTeX).
Well I have it in 25.0.5 and in 24.4.1. Also my other local-key binding
behave as expected for example in message mode.
D
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Indeed, \quad is displayed as a whitespace. That's kinda right
>> because it produces a whitespace as wide as the letter m but of
>> course it's probably inconvenient when editing.
>
>> Hm, what would you prefer instead?
>
>> ‘␠’ SYMBOL FOR SPACE
>
Hi Uwe,
2015-09-15 12:34 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> Hello
>
>
> I am currently facing two problems:
>
>
> - I always thought that local-key-binding via hook replaces the
> global-key-binding (at least so it is in Xemacs) now in GNU Emacs I have
> set (global-set-key "\C-cr" 'ispell-r
Hello
I am currently facing two problems:
- I always thought that local-key-binding via hook replaces the
global-key-binding (at least so it is in Xemacs) now in GNU Emacs I have
set (global-set-key "\C-cr" 'ispell-region)
(setq reftex-extra-bindings t)
which accord
>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> When turning prettify-symbols-mode on \quad disappears. That seems to
>> me a misbehavior. Opinions?
> Indeed, \quad is displayed as a whitespace. That's kinda right because
> it produces a whitespace as wide as the l
Uwe Brauer writes:
> When turning prettify-symbols-mode on \quad disappears. That seems to
> me a misbehavior. Opinions?
Indeed, \quad is displayed as a whitespace. That's kinda right because
it produces a whitespace as wide as the letter m but of course it's
probably inconvenient when editing.
Hello
When turning prettify-symbols-mode on \quad disappears. That seems to
me a misbehavior. Opinions?
Uwe Brauer
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
24 matches
Mail list logo
