Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH] A fix for longtable and a new style

2015-09-28 Thread Arash Esbati
Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano writes: > 2015-09-28 8:40 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn : >> Mosè Giordano writes: >> >>> `pushnew' can't append to variables, but my understanding is that it's >>> safer than `add-to-list' when it comes to let-bound variables (can >>> someone please confirm this?), >> >> Yes, `

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH] Small patch against reftex-vars.el

2015-09-28 Thread Arash Esbati
Hi Tassilo, Tassilo Horn writes: > Arash Esbati writes: > >> I have not signed the FSF papers for Emacs, > > Why not? Didn't we tell you that a CA on Emacs covers AUCTeX, too, but > the inverse is not true? Because of that, I usually encourage new > contributors to file a CA on Emacs instead

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] TeX output dimensions in ConTeXt

2015-09-28 Thread Carlos
Documents compiled with texexec, should use texexec and/or mkiv accordingly. Functions by/for texexec, are unaffected. I have seen many more adopted changes in 'mark iv' than with 'texexec'. For example, As recent as a month ago, a table's requirements (as specified by a power user) would not comp

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] TeX output dimensions in ConTeXt

2015-09-28 Thread Carlos
Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Carlos, > > 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos : > This breaks things for people not using "context", doesn't it? Documents compiled with texexec, should use texexec and/or mkiv accordingly. Functions by/for texexec, are unaffected. I have seen many more adopted changes

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] TeX output dimensions in ConTeXt

2015-09-28 Thread Carlos
Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Carlos, > > 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos : >> Mosè: >> >> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since >> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the >> warning is >> at. So far, in my end, until further notic

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] TeX output dimensions in ConTeXt

2015-09-28 Thread Carlos
Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Carlos, > > 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos : >> Mosè: >> >> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since >> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the >> warning is >> at. So far, in my end, until further notic

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] TeX output dimensions in ConTeXt

2015-09-28 Thread Carlos
Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Carlos, > > 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos : >> Mosè: >> >> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since >> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the >> warning is >> at. So far, in my end, until further notic

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] TeX output dimensions in ConTeXt

2015-09-28 Thread Carlos
Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Carlos, > > 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos : >> Mosè: >> >> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since >> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the >> warning is >> at. So far, in my end, until further notic

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH] A fix for longtable and a new style

2015-09-28 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Tassilo, 2015-09-28 8:40 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn : > Mosè Giordano writes: > >> `pushnew' can't append to variables, but my understanding is that it's >> safer than `add-to-list' when it comes to let-bound variables (can >> someone please confirm this?), > > Yes, `add-to-list' should not be use

[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 5ee567c8043f462ecf995eef424dd5d93b51f167

2015-09-28 Thread Mosè Giordano
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via 5ee567c8043f462ecf995eef424dd5d93b51f167 (commit) via f9a792823d641f0e5

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How to get a bounding box for the formula?

2015-09-28 Thread Tassilo Horn
Marcin Borkowski writes: Hi Marcin, > I'd like to be able to programatically get the dimensions of the > bounding box of a formula in my LaTeX buffer. I guess that the > previewing routines have that information; how could I get it? Yes, preview has that information but it is not very consumab