On 2015-10-16, at 13:58, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>
>> And using those, I will be soon able to move by tokens. The next step
>> could be making e.g. M-d and M-DEL kill a word /or/ a token, depending
>> on the context. For instance, in this situation:
>>
>> \foo-!-bar
>>
Marcin Borkowski writes:
> And using those, I will be soon able to move by tokens. The next step
> could be making e.g. M-d and M-DEL kill a word /or/ a token, depending
> on the context. For instance, in this situation:
>
> \foo-!-bar
>
> pressing M-DEL kills "foo", which doesn't make sense, a
On 2015-10-16, at 12:16, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>
>>> Uh, that sounds quite complicated to integrate into RefTeX.
>>> Basically, you have to have something similar to
>>> `reftex-parse-bibtex-entry' or `reftex-parse-bibitem' for amsrefs
>>> entries which knows about cust
Marcin Borkowski writes:
>> Uh, that sounds quite complicated to integrate into RefTeX.
>> Basically, you have to have something similar to
>> `reftex-parse-bibtex-entry' or `reftex-parse-bibitem' for amsrefs
>> entries which knows about custom entry types and fields.
>
> Well, what I would like
On 2015-10-16, at 10:22, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
>
> 2015-10-16 9:43 GMT+02:00 Marcin Borkowski :
>> This means that (most probably) I should look into reftex-cite.el, in
>> particular the parts which (a) look for files with the bibliography and
>> (b) extract info from them. But wher
On 2015-10-16, at 10:22, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>
> Hi Marcin,
>
>> Amsrefs is a (sort of) replacement for Bib(La)TeX. Unlike those
>> tools, it is written completely in TeX. The disadvantage of amsrefs
>> is that it can't sort entries - you have to take care of that
>
Hi Marcin,
2015-10-16 9:43 GMT+02:00 Marcin Borkowski :
> This means that (most probably) I should look into reftex-cite.el, in
> particular the parts which (a) look for files with the bibliography and
> (b) extract info from them. But where are they and how do they work...?
Yes, reftex-cite.el
Marcin Borkowski writes:
Hi Marcin,
> Amsrefs is a (sort of) replacement for Bib(La)TeX. Unlike those
> tools, it is written completely in TeX. The disadvantage of amsrefs
> is that it can't sort entries - you have to take care of that
> manually. The advantage is that you program the bibliog
On 2015-10-16, at 09:01, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
>>> So, my question is: Where should I start reading reftex's code to be
>>> able to start working on amsrefs support?
>>
>> Your help would be very welcome.
>
> Yes, absolutely!
Thanks!
(BTW, that doesn't mean that I'm no
Mosè Giordano writes:
> I'm really happy I'm not the only one having difficulties with
> understanding RefTeX' code! RefTeX is great, provides tons of useful
> features, but I find AUCTeX' code much much easier to read.
Amen.
>> So, my question is: Where should I start reading reftex's code to
10 matches
Mail list logo
