Re: tex.el compiler warnings

Arash Esbati writes: Hi Arash, >> Why is that needed? As far as I see, that function only complains >> about variables defined by AUCTeX itself which you can also defvar, >> no? > > Yes, the complaints about free variables `TeX-*' vanish by defvar'ing > them. That's good. >> In TeX-pdf-tools-

Re: Putting tex-math-face in tex group

> Arash Esbati writes: > Indeed, the code in tex-font.el is really outdated. And that's the > reason I thought I just silence the compiler without touching it. Ah I see. Then I'm fine with your proposal. I agree that it isn't worth taking care of tex-font.el. Regards, Ikumi Keita

Re: Putting tex-math-face in tex group

Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: >> Arash Esbati writes: >> tex-math-face defined in tex-font.el doesn't specify a custom group. >> Any objections if I apply this patch in order to pacify the compiler? Thanks for your response. > I think that the patch itself is harmless. At the same time, I

Re: tex.el compiler warnings

Hi Tassilo, Tassilo Horn writes: > Arash Esbati writes: > > the defvars look good to me. Thanks for checking. > Why is that needed? As far as I see, that function only complains about > variables defined by AUCTeX itself which you can also defvar, no? Yes, the complaints about free variable

Re: tex.el compiler warnings

Arash Esbati writes: Hi Arash, the defvars look good to me. > @@ -1188,15 +1233,16 @@ entry in `TeX-view-program-list-builtin'." > (error "PDF Tools only work with PDF output")) >(add-hook 'pdf-sync-backward-redirect-functions > #'TeX-source-correlate-handle-TeX-region) > -

Re: Putting tex-math-face in tex group

Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: > tex-math-face defined in tex-font.el doesn't specify a custom group. > Any objections if I apply this patch in order to pacify the compiler? I think that the patch itself is harmless. At the same time, I feel that we should overhaul tex-font.el if possible.