Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hmm, I now realized the current document is sparse about it. I wasn't
> aware of that. I hope I can make some addition in a few days (or next
> week?).
Thanks, no rush here
> Is there any way to notify ELPA AUCTeX users some announcement before
> they attempt to
>>> "IK" == Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi Arash,
>> Arash Esbati writes:
>> I'm contemplating the possibilities, actually. If we agree that
>> `TeX-modes' is the best way to control AUCTeX's behavior, fine with me.
>> We should then document it better, `TeX-modes' is currently somewhat
>> underr
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> I'm contemplating the possibilities, actually. If we agree that
> `TeX-modes' is the best way to control AUCTeX's behavior, fine with me.
> We should then document it better, `TeX-modes' is currently somewhat
> underrepresented in the manual, IMO.
Hmm, I n
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> That would blow away other entries in `major-mode-remap-alist'. I think
> it should be
> (setq major-mode-remap-alist
> (delete '(latex-mode . LaTeX-mode) major-mode-remap-alist))
> instead.
This is actually what I meant; I was thinking about setting the
va
