e tsdh-dark-theme. Before, I barely could see
math scripts ^ and _ in that theme.
Miguel.
Em qui., 8 de ago. de 2024 às 16:04, Christopher Dimech
escreveu:
> > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2024 at 6:48 AM
> > From: "Arash Esbati"
> > To: "Christopher Dimech"
Hi, Arash
I will return toolbar-x maintainance. It was a work of 15+ years ago, so I
will take a time to get into it again.
Em qui., 25 de jul. de 2024 às 05:51, Arash Esbati escreveu:
> After the tough work above, may I ask you for an easy one? When
> building AUCTeX with a current Emacs, t
Hi.
I use latest auctex-14.0.6. In Emacs, i use dark color theme.
For a long time I have been annoyed by not being able to see properly
script char ^ and _, like in formulas $x^2$.
Now investigating, in font-latex.el I see:
(defface font-latex-script-char-face
(let ((font '(:inherit underline
Hi
I use a dark theme in Emacs. For a long time I have been annoyed by not
being able to see script chars ^ or _ (dark red in dark background) like in
$x^2$.
Reading font-latex.el I realized that face definition for
`font-latex-script-char-face'
has the following:
(defface font-latex-script-char
Dear all
I have had no time to investigate this problem and in 2 weeks I don't thing
I will manage to get any time. I will look at this issue as soon as
possible.
Miguel.
On Feb 10, 2008 2:06 PM, Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just repeated the tests.
>
>- with the pk
Dear guys
From te time I wrote toolbar-x.el and the latex symbol toolbar, I made
exautive tests to ensure that it worked, even in XEmacs. The toolbar-x
package is only a matter of toolbar, nothing to do with AUCTeX. I will
investigate the problem in the weekend.
Miguel.
On Feb 4, 2008 10:18 AM
nreverse within the let-bind of involved variables, improving
readability.
I hope to announce further improvements soon.
Miguel.
On 12/2/06, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Miguel V. S. Frasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You have been a lot patient for lo
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Changes by: Miguel V. S. Frasson 06/12/04 20:32:43
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /sources/auctex/auctex/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 5.1448
retrieving revision 5.1449
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Changes by: Miguel V. S. Frasson 06/12/04 20:32:43
Index: toolbar-x.el
===
RCS file: /sources/auctex/auctex/toolbar-x.el,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Changes by: Miguel V. S. Frasson 06/12/04 20:32:43
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog toolbar-x.el
Log message:
Resolved bugs WRT let-binding tool-bar-map and making it local variable
(emacs display
Dear David and others
toolbar-x.el:1620:
;; un-reverting variables
(setq default (nreverse default))
(setq top (nreverse top))
(setq right (nreverse right))
(setq bottom (nreverse bottom))
(setq left(nreverse left))
It is clear from the preceding code that th
Hi Reiner
If we like to fix this, we have to parse the file every while (when
idle for some time) and refresh toolbar in case of change of viewer.
Of course we have ton improve the button definitions for the vewer. A
refresh takes little time.
Miguel.
On 9/14/06, Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Reiner
Good catch. Please commit this.
Miguel.
On 9/13/06, Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that when visiting some LaTeX files (during the last weeks),
the global tool bar got empty or vanished completely in non-LaTeX
buffers. It is extremely annoying then you hit `C
ocumented here.)
No surprise, in XEmacs. Even that ancient tool-bar is not fully documented.
Miguel.
On 9/13/06, Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11 2006, Miguel V. S. Frasson wrote:
> I don't know about you, but I find annoying when I am working inside
>
Dears from AUCTeX devel
I don't know about you, but I find annoying when I am working inside
auctex in some buffers (.tex sources), then I run latex, and a C-x b
gives me as default buffer to switch to the * output* buffer
intead of the one I was working just before the C-c C-c. Sometimes,
the f
On 8/2/06, Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
> You should, however, check with XEmacs. It will probably not like
> this entry.
Hm, `next-error' also uses `:visible' and I seem to recall that
`toolbar-x.el' is supposed to skip incompatible propert
>>> > * There is a single and important sintax change: the argument
>>> > `meaning-alist' becomes `meaning-alists' which is a list of alists or
>>> > variable bound to alists.
The term "*-meaning-alist" always looked odd to me. Wouldn't
"*-definition-alist" or "*-definitions" be better names?
Dear David
I will put this post back in auctex-devel.
On 7/28/06, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Miguel V. S. Frasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The situation is the following: I want to eventually implement a
> symbol toolbar without having to ge
Of course.
Sorry. I forgot about that list.
Miguel.
On 7/28/06, Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could we please discuss this on the development list (auctex-devel)
instead of the user list (auctex)?
On Fri, Jul 28 2006, Miguel V. S. Frasson wrote:
> Dear all
>
> For
19 matches
Mail list logo
