Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [culprit]

2015-03-10 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: `pushnew' is not aliased to `cl-pushnew' if `cl' library isn't loaded. When I open an AUCTeX buffer I get File mode specification error: (void-function pushnew) Should we defalias if not already defined? Why is that needed? As far as I can see, all

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [culprit]

2015-03-10 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Tassilo, 2015-03-10 8:02 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org: Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: `pushnew' is not aliased to `cl-pushnew' if `cl' library isn't loaded. When I open an AUCTeX buffer I get File mode specification error: (void-function pushnew) Should we defalias if

[AUCTeX-devel] [culprit] (was: «global.sty» include, master, subfiles)

2015-03-08 Thread Uwe Brauer
2015-03-08 19:40 GMT+01:00 Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es: No, I don't have a clue right now and I don't think XEmacs is intended to behave differently from Emacs in this regard. I think I found the culprit: it is TeX-style-path: , | `TeX-style-path' is a variable declared in Lisp.

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [culprit]

2015-03-08 Thread Tassilo Horn
Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es writes: The only thing I can think of might be (add-to-list 'path file t) Using `add-to-list' on locals is discouraged in GNU Emacs, too, so I've replaced it with `pushnew' / `nreverse'. ,[ C-h f add-to-list RET ] | add-to-list is a compiled Lisp function in