Ikumi Keita writes:
> FYI, If the order of the output is irrelavant (i.e., it is OK to give
> non-nil value for SORT), the essentially same function exists already in
> AUCTeX: `TeX-delete-duplicate-strings'.
Hi Keita,
thanks for the reminder. I thought about it but had the syntax wrong in
my
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Dear all,
>
> Arash asked me to delay the release of new version to next weekend, so
> that he can go apply some pending fixes he's working on.
Hi Mosè,
thanks. I pushed my changes to git, I'm good to go.
Best, Arash
___
auc
Dear all,
Arash asked me to delay the release of new version to next weekend, so
that he can go apply some pending fixes he's working on.
Bye,
Mosè
2017-11-19 0:21 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati :
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>>
>>> At any rate: not sure whether XEmacs has the
> Arash Esbati writes:
>> Ah, it's there, in reftex.el after all.
>>
>> (defun reftex-uniquify (list &optional sort)
>> ;; Return a list of all strings in LIST, but each only once, keeping order
>> ;; unless SORT is set (faster!).
>> [...]
>>
>> But that's specialized on strings, and a diff
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>> At any rate: not sure whether XEmacs has the same
>> make-hash-table/gethash/puthash calls.
Thanks for your response. I thought so as well (I don't have XEmacs on
my box).
> Ah, it's there, in reftex.el after all.
>
> (defun reftex-uniquify
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>>> So, everyone who has a patch that would like to be included in version
>>> 11.92 please send it now.
>>
>> I'd like to apply the change in
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/2017-09/msg4.html
>> . Does anyone find difficulties with it?
> The p
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>>> (defun delete-dups (list)
>>> "Destructively remove `equal' duplicates from LIST.
>>> Store the result in LIST and return it. LIST must be a proper list.
>>> Of several `equal' occurrences of an element in LIST, the first
>>> one is kept."
>
David Kastrup writes:
>> (defun delete-dups (list)
>> "Destructively remove `equal' duplicates from LIST.
>> Store the result in LIST and return it. LIST must be a proper list.
>> Of several `equal' occurrences of an element in LIST, the first
>> one is kept."
>> (let ((l (length list)))
>>
Arash Esbati writes:
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
>> 2017-11-10 18:42 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>>>
Ok, what's about styles? Could those go in the future in both branches,
in master in the 11.92-old or whatever the name of the branch will be??
>>>
>>> The point of
Mosè Giordano writes:
> 2017-11-10 18:42 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>>
>>> Ok, what's about styles? Could those go in the future in both branches,
>>> in master in the 11.92-old or whatever the name of the branch will be??
>>
>> The point of stopping development for XEmacs i
Hi Keita,
2017-11-11 15:46 GMT+01:00 Ikumi Keita :
> Hi all,
>
>> Mosè Giordano writes:
>> So, everyone who has a patch that would like to be included in version
>> 11.92 please send it now.
>
> I'd like to apply the change in
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/2017-09/msg4
Hi all,
> Mosè Giordano writes:
> So, everyone who has a patch that would like to be included in version
> 11.92 please send it now.
I'd like to apply the change in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/2017-09/msg4.html
. Does anyone find difficulties with it?
Regards,
Ikumi
2017-11-10 18:42 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>
> "Mosè" == Mosè Giordano writes:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>
>>> now that the Ghostscript issue has been fixed I think it's a good
>>> time to release a new version of AUCTeX, that will be the last in
>>> the 11.x seri
Uwe Brauer writes:
"Mosè" == Mosè Giordano writes:
>
>> Dear all,
>
>> now that the Ghostscript issue has been fixed I think it's a good
>> time to release a new version of AUCTeX, that will be the last in
>> the 11.x series concerning new features. At the same time we'l
>>> "Mosè" == Mosè Giordano writes:
> Dear all,
> now that the Ghostscript issue has been fixed I think it's a good
> time to release a new version of AUCTeX, that will be the last in
> the 11.x series concerning new features. At the same time we'll
> release AUCTeX 12.01, (alm
Dear all,
now that the Ghostscript issue has been fixed I think it's a good time
to release a new version of AUCTeX, that will be the last in the 11.x
series concerning new features. At the same time we'll release AUCTeX
12.01, (almost?) identical to 11.92, but it'll support only GNU Emacs
>= 24
16 matches
Mail list logo
