> Hi Uwe,
> 2016-04-23 19:01 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> We already have hundreds of lines of compatibility code for XEmacs,
> and some of them also applies to GNU Emacs 21.
> Out of curiosity, based on your experience, are there AUCTeX users
> running XEmacs? Back in 2005, thes
Hi Uwe,
2016-04-23 19:01 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> Sigh.
> In a nutshell and still as the responsible, official Xemacs auctex
> package manager, I would say:
> please consider a solution such that
>
> (if (featurep 'xemacs) dont-implement-that-feature)
>
> But don't make auctex incompatible with Xe
> 2016-04-13 20:20 GMT+02:00 Matthew Leach :
> I have XEmacs installed on my computer but I don't use it. I just
> compile AUCTeX from time to time to make sure there aren't huge errors
> (like functions not defined there. BTW, to be sure I'm not going to
> introduce a function n
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Bug tracker isn't a good sample of our community, but sometimes I
> think we're still supporting XEmacs for just one person.
Well, I guess 1 in 10 users of Emacsens uses AUCTeX, so that seems
plausible for XEmacs. By the same metric, there are at least 6 AUCTeX
users al
2016-04-13 20:20 GMT+02:00 Matthew Leach :
> Hm, interesting. I should probably have a working XEmacs installation
> if I'm working on AUCTeX
I have XEmacs installed on my computer but I don't use it. I just
compile AUCTeX from time to time to make sure there aren't huge errors
(like functio
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Matt,
Hi Mosè,
> 2016-04-13 14:45 GMT+02:00 Matthew Leach :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please see the attached TikZ patches.
>
> Looks good, thanks.
Thanks for taking a look. Pushed.
>> I saw that the last set I pushed
>> broke compatibility with XEmacs, sorry about that.
Hi Matt,
2016-04-13 14:45 GMT+02:00 Matthew Leach :
> Hi all,
>
> Please see the attached TikZ patches.
Looks good, thanks.
> I saw that the last set I pushed
> broke compatibility with XEmacs, sorry about that. I'm posting these
> here to ensure I don't break it again!
Actually, that particu
Hi all,
Please see the attached TikZ patches. I saw that the last set I pushed
broke compatibility with XEmacs, sorry about that. I'm posting these
here to ensure I don't break it again!
Thanks,
--
Matt
>From b1dea28834634d0f26e0a225e3e38aaeaf0523e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Leach
