* Tassilo Horn (2012-11-30) writes:
> Of course, it has to be (featurep 'emacs). ;-)
Yeah, I forgot to wrap the original proposal into a `(not ...)'. Since
I've never heard of `(featurep 'emacs)' I've now changed it to the more
conventional `(not (featurep 'xemacs))'.
--
Ralf
Uwe Brauer writes:
Hi Uwe,
>> Hm, the XEmacs version I have installed (21.5 (beta 31) "ginger") has
>> it:
>
>> (require FEATURE &optional FILENAME NOERROR)
>
> Has I have been told by Stephen Turnbull, the package
> should be 21.4.X compatible not 21.5.X!
>
> (That is why org mod
>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:27:50 +0100, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hello
> Ralf Angeli writes:
> Hi Ralf,
>> Awesome. I'll test-drive the things I use regularly tomorrow and
>> report back if I find a problem.
> Hm, the XEmacs version I have installed (21.5 (beta 31) "ginger") has
> it:
Ralf Angeli writes:
Hi Ralf,
>> Awesome. I'll test-drive the things I use regularly tomorrow and
>> report back if I find a problem.
So at least in my usual latex/xetex work, I didn't find any problem.
> You might have seen that I started the release procedure.
> Unfortunately I had to abort
* Tassilo Horn (2012-11-28) writes:
> Awesome. I'll test-drive the things I use regularly tomorrow and report
> back if I find a problem.
You might have seen that I started the release procedure. Unfortunately
I had to abort it because I was not able to create the XEmacs package.
When compiling
Ralf Angeli writes:
Hi Ralf,
>> I'll try to look at the problem with the defcustoms this weekend.
>> Perhaps I also have time to look at other parts of the patch. For
>> example, if `LaTeX-always-use-biber' makes sense or if we should
>> enable something automatically in a biblatex style file.
* Ralf Angeli (2012-11-10) writes:
> * Tassilo Horn (2012-11-10) writes:
>
>> In my opinion, the current 11.86 release has so many known issues like
>> preview not working with recent emacsen that it has no value in holding
>> back a new release, but simply release more often when bugs get reporte
* Tassilo Horn (2012-11-10) writes:
> Ralf Angeli writes:
>
>> As I've mentioned before, I can do the release as well. But I haven't
>> had time to thoroughly look at the Biber patch which I wanted to do
>> before we make a release. Has somebody else inspected it?
>
> No, I don't use Biber (yet
Ralf Angeli writes:
>> The xemacs-package target seems to work, but it byte-compiles the
>> files with emacs (I don't have xemacs installed). Probably, files
>> compiled with emacs 24 won't run on XEmacs, right? How would I tell
>> it to use XEmacs if I had installed it? Re-configuring with
>>
* Tassilo Horn (2012-11-09) writes:
> I think it's time to roll a new AUCTeX release.
I think so, too. However, I've yet to check the Biber patch. There is
at least one thing about it I don't like and that is the renaming of
existing defcustoms. This would break the setup of users with existin
David Kastrup writes:
>> The xemacs-package target seems to work, but it byte-compiles the
>> files with emacs (I don't have xemacs installed). Probably, files
>> compiled with emacs 24 won't run on XEmacs, right? How would I tell
>> it to use XEmacs if I had installed it? Re-configuring with
Tassilo Horn writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it's time to roll a new AUCTeX release. I've tried out the
> release procedure documented in the Makefile. I omitted the
> release-commit target and used TAG=2012-11-09 (you can use tags and
> dates).
>
> The normal dist target creating the tarball and
Hi all,
I think it's time to roll a new AUCTeX release. I've tried out the
release procedure documented in the Makefile. I omitted the
release-commit target and used TAG=2012-11-09 (you can use tags and
dates).
The normal dist target creating the tarball and zip distribution work
fine.
The xem
13 matches
Mail list logo
