Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes:
> Ok, I pushed a change to AUCTeX repo acc. to this.
Thanks for your time. I tried the new entry for \overunderset in
amsmath.el, but it seems wrong to me with a minimal sample like this.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\(\overunderset{above}{i=below}{\prod}\)
\end{document}
Isn't the right entry like this?
diff --git a/style/amsmath.el b/style/amsmath.el
index 65aed4e2..2c06380b 100644
--- a/style/amsmath.el
+++ b/style/amsmath.el
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
'("xrightarrow" ["Below"] "Above")
'("overset" "Accent symbol" "Symbol")
'("underset" "Accent symbol" "Symbol")
- '("overunderset" "Accent symbol" "Symbol below" "Symbol")
+ '("overunderset" "Symbol above" "Symbol below" "Accent symbol")
'("dfrac" 2)
'("tfrac" 2)
'("binom" 2)
I think the definition in amsmath.sty supports my idea:
\newcommand{\overunderset}[3]{\binrel@{#3}%
\binrel@@{\mathop{\kern\z@#3}\limits^{#1}_{#2}}}
(The order of the arguments is different from \overset and \underset...
I wonder why amsmath developer chose such confusing order.)
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
