Documents compiled with texexec, should use texexec and/or mkiv
accordingly. Functions by/for texexec, are unaffected.
I have seen many more adopted changes in 'mark iv' than with
'texexec'. For example, As recent as a month ago, a table's requirements (as
specified by a power user) would not comp
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
> This breaks things for people not using "context", doesn't it?
Documents compiled with texexec, should use texexec and/or mkiv
accordingly. Functions by/for texexec, are unaffected.
I have seen many more adopted changes
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
>> Mosè:
>>
>> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since
>> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the
>> warning is
>> at. So far, in my end, until further notic
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
>> Mosè:
>>
>> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since
>> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the
>> warning is
>> at. So far, in my end, until further notic
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
>> Mosè:
>>
>> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since
>> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the
>> warning is
>> at. So far, in my end, until further notic
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> 2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
>> Mosè:
>>
>> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since
>> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the
>> warning is
>> at. So far, in my end, until further notic
Hi Carlos,
2015-09-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
> Mosè:
>
> I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since
> only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the warning
> is
> at. So far, in my end, until further notice:
>
> --- /context.el 2015-09-27 1
Mosè:
I still think (point-min) is a better alternative than (point-max) since
only a greater than > is required, that would jump right to where the warning is
at. So far, in my end, until further notice:
--- /context.el 2015-09-27 15:10:40.285263202 -0400
+++ /context.el 2015-09-27 15:39:12.673
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> 2015-09-24 5:36 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
>> You asked "what's wrong with ConTeXt Full?".
>>
>> I guess nothing is wrong, if the document was compiled with it a while
>> ago.
>>
>> I also think that if ("context full") returns an error such as "no
>> more errors",
Hi Carlos,
2015-09-24 5:36 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
> You asked "what's wrong with ConTeXt Full?".
>
> I guess nothing is wrong, if the document was compiled with it a while
> ago.
>
> I also think that if ("context full") returns an error such as "no
> more errors", when there are errors, something is
But then if the document compiles, why would I need to C-c C-l .. or see
the compilation?
But then it depends (like I said) in the contents of the file. But
point-max with errors, is making the warning e.g., (tex error in l.03 ,
) not visible.
Anyway. Have a good one Mosè
__
Hello Mosè. How's everything?
Mosè, probably needs the function, and the parser.
You asked "what's wrong with ConTeXt Full?".
I guess nothing is wrong, if the document was compiled with it a while
ago.
I also think that if ("context full") returns an error such as "no
more errors", when there a
Hi Carlos,
2015-09-22 14:44 GMT+02:00 Carlos :
>
> I'm having a problem with the frame output dimensions of the window.
> Or the output buffer of a file.
>
> This is something undesirable, not from an aesthetic point of view, but
> from following up with errors, warnings, and the whole family, wh
Normally in a latex file, when one encounters errors, such as the above
in ConTeXt, (undefined control sequence), the file tex-buf.el is called
with all the information related to it. But it's right there, at level,
centered in the screen, for example:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\it
I forgot to mention that the call is performed with ConTeXt Full
specified as the following in tex.el
("ConTeXt" "texexec --once --texutil %(extraopts) %(execopts)%t"
TeX-run-TeX t (context-mode) :help "Run ConTeXt once")
("ConTeXt Full" "context --synctex %t"
TeX-run-TeX t
So t
I'm having a problem with the frame output dimensions of the window.
Or the output buffer of a file.
This is something undesirable, not from an aesthetic point of view, but
from following up with errors, warnings, and the whole family, which
results throughout the compilation of a document.
It
16 matches
Mail list logo
