On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
>> Hi Uwe,
>> 2015-06-10 8:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>
>> Well, AUCTeX (actually *Emacs) expects a program to be in a PATH
>> directory, not necessarily /usr/bin. If /usr/texbin is not in the
>> PATH, AUCTeX cannot find xdvi
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Hi Uwe,
>> 2015-06-10 8:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>
>> Well, AUCTeX (actually *Emacs) expects a program to be in a PATH
>> directory, not necessarily /usr/bin. If /usr/texbin is not in the
>> PATH, AUCTeX cannot find xdvi, did you expect something else?
> Hi Uwe,
> 2015-06-10 8:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> Well, AUCTeX (actually *Emacs) expects a program to be in a PATH
> directory, not necessarily /usr/bin. If /usr/texbin is not in the
> PATH, AUCTeX cannot find xdvi, did you expect something else?
Hm that is odd.
I thought that
Hi Uwe,
2015-06-10 8:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> Hello
>
> Although I use Linux most of the time (with Xemacs 21.5.34 and auctex
> 11.83 without problems), I found the following problem
> when I used Xemacs 21.4.22 Mule on Mac OS Yosmite. Xemacs 21.4.22 is
> shipped by port (Xcode installed) so up
Hello
Although I use Linux most of the time (with Xemacs 21.5.34 and auctex
11.83 without problems), I found the following problem
when I used Xemacs 21.4.22 Mule on Mac OS Yosmite. Xemacs 21.4.22 is
shipped by port (Xcode installed) so upgrading to 21.5.34 means
compiling which turned out a bit d
