Re: Proposal to fix simultaneity (Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1))

2022-03-08 Thread Ikumi Keita
> Ikumi Keita writes: > Tassilo Horn writes: >>> I expect the attached patch addresses this issue. What do you think >>> about it? >> Yes, looks correct and simple enough. So I'm all in favor of it. > Thanks, I installed the change in the git repo. Sorry, this breaks region preview

Re: Proposal to fix simultaneity (Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1))

2022-02-25 Thread Ikumi Keita
> Tassilo Horn writes: >> I expect the attached patch addresses this issue. What do you think >> about it? > Yes, looks correct and simple enough. So I'm all in favor of it. Thanks, I installed the change in the git repo. Cheers, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopRussianAggression

Re: Proposal to fix simultaneity (Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1))

2022-02-25 Thread Tassilo Horn
Ikumi Keita writes: Hi Keita, > This is a continuation of 1.5-year old thread. Better late than never. :-) >>> I'd say it's not serious but we should address it anyway, and making >>> it local in the process buffer seems like a suitable approach. > > I expect the attached patch addresses this

Proposal to fix simultaneity (Re: Onwards to lexical binding (attempt 1))

2022-02-25 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Tassilo, This is a continuation of 1.5-year old thread. > Ikumi Keita writes: > Tassilo Horn writes: >> Ikumi Keita writes: >>> The reason is that sentinel functions `TeX-LaTeX-sentinel' and those in >>> preview.el call `TeX-active-master', which depends on the global dynamic >>>