Hi Arash,
> Sigh, sorry for the dumb question! I was looking at the source and your
> patch at the same time and lost track there.
No problem. Feel free to give any other comments if you find somthing
other to ask.
Bye,
Ikumi Keita
___
auctex-devel
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> It is there in order for the following ",face" to be expanded as
> intended.
Sigh, sorry for the dumb question! I was looking at the source and your
patch at the same time and lost track there.
Thanks for taking your time.
Best, Arash
Hi Arash,
> first of all, a big thank you for diving into this and your profound
> analysis. font-latex.el is not my strongest point, but I think I
> understood your findings and they make sense to me. Maybe others could
> confirm.
Thank you for taking a look and giving encouraging comments.
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
first of all, a big thank you for diving into this and your profound
analysis. font-latex.el is not my strongest point, but I think I
understood your findings and they make sense to me. Maybe others could
confirm.
I have a question reg. your patch and sorry if
