Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
@17I can't help with your specific config because I don't know Apache and think Apache is a giant complicated mess. Good luck with it, but you'll have to get specific input from someone else as to whether it's
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
I am hosting it on a VPS. I have tried using the mod_expires module and my Virtual Host code is below:ExpiresActive OnExpiresDefault "access plus 2 minutes"ExpiresByType text/html "access plus 2 minutes"I will
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Are you hosting it on a VPS? WordPress isn't the issue, you're probably just getting lucky with your WordPress config.Look up the HTTp cache-control header. You need to set that to not cache. If you can't, fin
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Hey guys,So I decided to go with Jekyll. Everything works neatly but there's one problem. Whenevr I make a change to my site and someone enters it, in order to notice the change they need to refresh the page with F5, which wa
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Just saying, route probing is not the only security flaw. There is even a lot of info on rendered HTML source code. It was just an example.But yes, there are some precautions to take. Like I said, probably good for low-traffic sites
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
If all you want is a static website with content, installing a web server like Apache and writing your HTML files should be enough. You may want to configure Apache not to allow users to traverse directories on the web server, but
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
No it is not. If you want a static website, you're better off installing Apache, configuring a website, and uploading your HTML files to the server. You can also install PHP and MySQL if you need to run PHP scripts and/or work
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
No it is not. If you want a static website, you're better off installing Apache, configuring a website, and uploading your HTML files to the server. You can also install PHP and MySQL if you need to run PHP scripts and/or work
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
No it is not. If you want a static website, you're better off installing Apache, configuring a website, and uploading your HTML files to the server. You can also install PHP and MySQL if you need to run PHP scripts and/or work
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
I use wordpress for my other sites. Its not that secure, but I take precautions. I won't recommend it to someone who is new to site development and web servers in general though as it is confusing and a nightmare to configure.
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
I know Jetpack, I also use a plugin that can hide common routers like wp-admin, and of course Updraft Plus.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/531128/#p531128
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Wordpress is a lot better than it used to be.You do need to secure it though.That means loading a lot of extra modules some payed some not some harder than others but it can be done.If you do get wordpress on your site, I'd str
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
@8 there is possible to change those roots.but regarding wordpress itself, it was made of a bullshit system called b2cafelog which wasn't secure, was buggy and was CPU intensive.although those were fixed, but as wordpress is po
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
@7, I believe you. I mean, people can easily check to see if you have a wordpress installation if you visit certain routes just as an example.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/530907/#p530907
--
Audiogames-reflector
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
@7, I believe you! I mean, people can easily check to see if you have a wordpress installation if you visit certain routes.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/530907/#p530907
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
@6It's not a problem until it is. Once it is, it's too late.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/530902/#p530902
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
https://
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Yeah. Jekyll is a good static site generator.And yes there are security vulnerabilities, but if you're putting up a simple low-traffic website, I actually don't mind using Wordpress. I have a couple of instances with Markdo
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
@4It's a big deal when someone hacks you, puts you in a botnet, and then you get banned from your VPS provider. Almost a true story in my case, but fortunately we stopped short of the banning (and then I left anyway because
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Oh I understand. I heard many bad things about Wordpress security, but when I have a server dedicated for my blog/website, that isn't such a dealbreaker anymore, as I keep my content on my HDD anyway. I must try Yekyl, many
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Yeah, I'd pass on WordPress. Nikola does blogs, as do the rest of them. Often the primary thing they do is blogs, and it's a struggle to get them to do much else. But setting WordPress up and maintaining it is a nightma
Re: Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Static site generators can also be used to create a blog. Most of them have Markdown to HTML converters where you write your posts in markdown and they are automatically converted to static pages when they are built. I'm using J
Is Wordpress a good deal if it comes to static sites
Hi!I heard a lot about various CMS software, like Wordpress, Joomla and so on.My goal is to set up both a blog and a static website, meaning that a blog will be one of the elements of the site. Is Wordpress OK for that? Or I should use a
22 matches
Mail list logo