AlienBBC (via mplayer) resamples to 44.1kHz PCM, does this mean this
wouldn't work? Should we think about changing to 48kHz?
Nei
--
Neil Sleightholm
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
Anyone know of a reseller that will sell it in the UK?
Max
dean Wrote:
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/sonicimpact/t.html[/color]
I'm using this amp for the speakers mounted in the ceiling and it
works terrific and you can't beat the price.
-dean
--
max.spicer
The wild things
Well, it would seem to me that as record decks were sensitive to
vibration, this idea then carried over to cd players (which may be
effected, due to the moving parts) and then onto other audio
equipment.
However, I did read somewhere once that capacitors can be sensitive to
vibration - movement
Glad you clarified the kidding part, Sean. It sure seemed like a
little jab at your friends in tubular-land, but then I was wondering if
there was actually a good reason for upsampling.
So, is there any other reason you can think of to do this, other than
to save the cost of another crystal?
Davey Wrote:
The 0-40 settings refer to the volume setting on the graphical display
on the player. I didn't make any change to the preamp volume control
settingit's at the default setting of zero.
Davey.
Can we infer from the graph then that if you set preamp volume control
to 10
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 06:27 -0700, Dave D wrote:
So, is there any other reason you can think of to do this, other than
to save the cost of another crystal?
Cost of a crystal. I doubt it. The switched to a cheaper integrated chip
(or chipset) and didn't care what the specs are. It actually
Would guess 99% percent of people buying soundbridge don't want to know
about bits. Roku knows their market. If someone cares about sound
quality enough to look at what the products really offer they wouldn't
be buying soundbridge anyway. 48k is not going to be a problem for
them. They just
Dave D Wrote:
So, is there any other reason you can think of to do this, other than
to save the cost of another crystal?
It's just shaving pennies. probably an AC97 chip - extremely cheap.
Ironically, I have a $29.99 DVD player here which still manages to
output different sample rates!
