[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread highdudgeon
Oh, I'm sure all the power mod and what-not people will soon find problems and come up with thousand dollar solutions. Snake oil always flows... -- highdudgeon SB3, Lavry DA10, Sony DVP 555es, Bel Canto Pre2, Carver Sunfire, Rane DEQ60L, Harbeth Monitor 40s, ACI Force subs

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Moore
2006-07-24-20:06:05 highdudgeon: Oh, I'm sure all the power mod and what-not people will soon find problems and come up with thousand dollar solutions. Snake oil always flows... 2006-07-24-20:29:35 JJZolx: The first idiot that let's one of those hacks inside a $2000 component should be

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread trishend
Hi Sean This is exciting news about your new product! I am very keen on the transporter, but would like to know the quality/character of the audio it produces. Different DAC's have different sounds based on the design of their audio circuts, and not only the DAC chip that is used. What does the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread Jetlag
I'm assuming that there will be some type of ultra high-end power cord included to truly optimize the sound? The Transporter is actuually only $399, the rest is for the cord! ;) -- Jetlag Jetlag's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread seanadams
Jetlag Wrote: I'm assuming that there will be some type of ultra high-end power cord included to truly optimize the sound? Sorry, not from us! -- seanadams seanadams's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter questions for the Slim Devices folks

2006-07-24 Thread seanadams
mkozlows Wrote: 1. Will this require a new version of SlimServer to work (6.5?), or will it work with the current version? Yes, 6.5 will be required. Transporter support in the server, plus a new transporter-capable softsqueeze will be checked in soon, so the server will get plenty of bake

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter questions for the Slim Devices folks

2006-07-24 Thread ackcheng
Do you mean the SRP for the transporter is 1999? SO if we order now, we basically get SB3 for free? -- ackcheng ackcheng's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=133 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter questions for the Slim Devices folks

2006-07-24 Thread seanadams
ackcheng Wrote: Do you mean the SRP for the transporter is 1999? SO if we order now, we basically get SB3 for free? Yes. The reason we don't call it free is because we charge you for the SB3 when it ships (immediately). Then it's subtracted from the Transporter price, charged separately when

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter questions for the Slim Devices folks

2006-07-24 Thread JJZolx
seanadams Wrote: In case you're wondering, the reason for announcing early and pushing for pre-orders is mainly to get a handle on manufacturing requirements - this is the first time we've had two siginficantly different products. I very much like the early announcement as it affects the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter questions for the Slim Devices folks

2006-07-24 Thread rupped
Trying to figure out if I can sell my fancy pants pre amp to fund a Transporter (don't take any grief over the name, it has many cool meanings to me). Are both the analog outputs hot? I have one amp for my real system that takes balanced and would like to feed the other amp concurrently with the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread aberdeencomponents
seanadams Wrote: Good question - definitely not like tubes! Of course you could add a tube preamp if that's what you want. However, I don't think I could point to some existing DAC on the market and say it'll sound like that. The thing is, not only is this a new DAC chip with a much

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread Pale Blue Ego
Congratulations to the Slim Devices team for the new Transporter design. It looks to have addressed many of the requests and suggestions that have been aired here and elsewhere. As for the price, though it may be out of the range of a large segment of current SB owners, it seems reasonable as an

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread seanadams
aberdeencomponents Wrote: Sean, you sure did a great job with this unit. At the price piont I would rate it as a pure bargain. Did you use my sugestion of having upsampling rate conversion on the digital out? If so what chip did you use? Anthony There is no upsampling chip, but it could

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Slim Devices Transporter?

2006-07-24 Thread gusi
On ya Slim, I am looking forward to hearing it. cheers Gus -- gusi gusi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3801 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25773

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter questions for the Slim Devices folks

2006-07-24 Thread seanadams
ackcheng Wrote: If linear power supply is used. Does that mean there will be 220V version and 110V version? No, one model for both. It measures the line voltage using an ADC, and uses a relay to configure the primary windings accordingly. -- seanadams