bigfool1956;245697 Wrote:
> then you get married
Cute post.
And as it turns out - "married then gets you".
.
--
haunyack
Transporter -> B&K R200.2 -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. (Listening room)
SB3 (RWA analog) -> Rotel RB1070 -> B&W Matrix 805. (Bedroom)
Fridgidare -> Mirror Pond pale ale
Looking at the original post:
Isn't option 1 what happens when you have a great hi-fi and then you
get married, and option 2 what you get when you slink off to another
room ipod in hand?
--
bigfool1956
David Ayers
Music is what counts, hifi just helps us enjoy it more
> I have always been perplexed by the commonly-held view that to be a true
> music lover you have to have lots of it. In what other field is quantity
> regarded as more important than quality?
I think it goes hand-in-glove that someone who loves something will
tend to accumulate material related
Hello everyone.
Although I've only just registered on the forum I've owned a SB3 for
just over a year. My SB3 replaced a PC with a Teratec sound card
connected to a Yamaha AV amp. Then began lots of equipment purchases
including a Musical Fidelity X-DAC v3, X-CAN v3 and X-PSU followed by a
pair of
Moving this to the audiophile forum...
Mike
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Systems
slimdevices.com
mvalera's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11086
V
sosleepy;245532 Wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions so far.I use the squeezebox way more than
> the CD player, and generally use FLAC as my chosen source, though I
> don't discriminate against MP3.
Nice way to put it SoSleepy. I have not heard that term used with MP3s!
Hope you don't mind bu
Be very careful about "oomph". If the SB3 had more "oomph" than the CD
player, it might be that you'd be saying the CD player had more
"subtlety".
Everything has two sides: "sparkle" ("harshness"), "warmth"
("boominess"), "clarity" ("overly forward") etc etc. If you've already
decided what your r
cliveb;245556 Wrote:
> I have always been perplexed by the commonly-held view that to be a true
> music lover you have to have lots of it. In what other field is quantity
> regarded as more important than quality?
None of any consequence, but I'm not so sure that audio quantity really
is regarded
JJZolx;245508 Wrote:
> 1) Have a hi-fi system to die for, but only be able to play on it a
> relatively small selection of, say, 300 musical masterpieces,
> beautifully recorded and mastered.
That's an interesting point of view, and one I have a lot of sympathy
for. My music library is about 1200
