In my personnal installation SC 7.2.1 run under a Mac Mini 2 GHz 2 Go
RAM running Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)... much more than enough isn't it ?
--
jeanchris
jeanchris's Profile:
I just read this again - that's just laughable - this reviewer thinks an
AV receiver is audiophile quality, but the analogue outputs of the
Transporter are not?
hahahaha.
--
amey01
amey01's Profile:
kjg;356163 Wrote:
Mark Lanctot wrote:
Nonreality;355413 Wrote:
It could have at least mentioned dbpoweramp
Agreed, although there are more than just those two, and the article
shouldn't have to go on for 20 pages...
and a better overall ripper and converter than EAC.
So you're saying Microsoft's claim that Windows is better falls on deaf
ears, in your case? ;-)
--
androidtopp
My SB3 is the most expensive part of my stereo. So I'm not going to brag
about it.
And my SBB as well...Is it wrong that my alarm clock is worth more than
most of my stereo
vincentyan;318146 Wrote:
Dear GuyDebord,
Please confirm your finding that WAV is better than FLAC in terms of
sound quality. There are folks that are getting serious on this.
Vincent
Such claims have been made many times in the past. Upon further
investigation, they always turned out
opaqueice;357062 Wrote:
Such claims have been made many times in the past. Upon further
investigation, they always turned out to be:
1) not audible in a blind test, hence almost certainly the result of
expectation bias, or
2) the result of replay gain. WAV files do not have replay
Forget locking threads...
Any more personal attacks will result in temp and then permanent bans.
You have been warned. :)
Mike
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Business Unit
slimdevices.com
All,
As this discussion area resulted in the highest number of heated
threads, we're going to start living by some stricter rules here.
Any personal attacks against another forum member will now result in a
temporary ban on the forum. That will be your first and only warning.
If any member who
Phil Leigh;354661 Wrote:
Excellent info - thanks Clive! - I liked Camel in their Snow Goose
period - and (whispers) I like musicals too. And Supertramp - well I
still think COTC is one of the greatest albums ever!
Off to Amazon...
Ordered - £15 used from the US... seems they made a few
mvalera wrote:
As this discussion area resulted in the highest number of heated
threads, we're going to start living by some stricter rules here.
Thank you.
This a hobby. I do it for fun. And many of the threads here have not
been fun.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
I'm amazed no-one's mentioned Mackie monitors yet. I've got a set of
HR624's, and they're absolutely fantastic.
Alternatively, Genelec monitors are almost universally acclaimed, so
they've got to be worth an audition
--
cbemoore
The article says Sonos and Slim Devices both use very good
analog-to-digital converters in their products, which means you can
connect their analog outputs to a high-quality self-amplified speaker
system and get great results.
Surely they mean digital-to-analog convertors??
--
cbemoore
cbemoore wrote:
I'm amazed no-one's mentioned Mackie monitors yet. I've got a set of
HR624's, and they're absolutely fantastic.
I have a paid of HR828 and they are fantastic. But, they are not cheap,
mine were about $1200 for the pair. They are pretty ugly, they are fine
for my recording
I also have a pair of Swans M-200's (based on a recommendation from this
forum some time ago). They're serving as bedroom speakers right now,
hooked up to a Tivo and an SB2. Sound quality is (IMHO) excellent for
the price, and the build quality is also pretty amazing. Highly
recommended if you
pfarrell;357131 Wrote:
cbemoore wrote:
I'm amazed no-one's mentioned Mackie monitors yet. I've got a set of
HR624's, and they're absolutely fantastic.
I have a paid of HR828 and they are fantastic. ...
Original poster: check them out... I have learned over the years to
place great
15 matches
Mail list logo
