...it sounds much better then the SB alone.
--
Hanswurst
Hanswurst's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=29390
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=61755
?? Are you running 7.4? I'm very surprised no one at Logitech (esp.
Sean) told you that they indeed is a bug that does not allow 24 bit
FlAC files to be decoded on the fly (assuming that's what you're
doing). I will look up the bug number and edit/post it here. I took
all my 24/48 and 24/96
ted_b;413098 Wrote:
?? Are you running 7.4? I'm very surprised no one at Logitech (esp.
Sean) told you that they indeed is a bug that does not allow
higher-than-16/44 FlAC files to be decoded on the fly (assuming that's
what you're doing). I will look up the bug number and edit/post it
regalma1;412781 Wrote:
It would be interesting if they came up a with a statistically
significant negative result, say 20%, what would that mean? I've never
seen that.
That would happen every so often due to pure chance. When a
statistically significant result happens (say for a subset of
Phil Leigh;413291 Wrote:
Server-side decoding vs client-side decoding makes no difference to the
sound in any of the tests I have done (on the SB3 - I'm willing to bet
the same is true of the TP). I really don't understand why you can't
just stick with streaming FLAC to the TP. That's what
Phil Leigh;413291 Wrote:
Server-side decoding vs client-side decoding makes no difference to the
sound in any of the tests I have done (on the SB3 - I'm willing to bet
the same is true of the TP). I really don't understand why you can't
just stick with streaming FLAC to the TP. That's what
darrenyeats;413307 Wrote:
Am I picking up a slightly more objective tone to your posts these days
Phil? Or maybe I'm just expecting you to? :p (Maybe there should be an
option to blank the poster's name so we can read posts blind?!)
Darren
(Chortle.)
Darren, I didn't realise I wasn't being
ted_b;413309 Wrote:
?? Not my point at all. I was simply stating that this (on the fly
FLAC hi-bit-rate decoding) might be why the OP is having his issues.
Let's fix his problem, ok?
??? - (I like the sound better that way...go figure).
I was responding to this remark in your post...
Based on that bug it's not clear to me the method that will be employed
via digital volume. Will it be truncating bit depth, or something more
elegant?
I realize it's possible to do digital volume control that doesn't
introduce audible problems (loss of dynamic range, etc) but it's not
clear if
kphinney;209304 Wrote:
2pm EST, Saturday June 16
I just bought a Channel Islands Audio DAC and a friend of mine is on
his way over with a Benchmark DAC1 for a little comparison. I'd like
You to tell us what comparisons to run and we'll report back with our
impressions.
Many here are
aubuti;411600 Wrote:
I'm looking to upgrade the system in my living room/lounge.
The room is about 13ft x 15ft (4m x 4.6m) with an 8ft ceiling, .We
listen to various types of music, rock, acoustic, vocal, classical,
although not much jazz.
My budget is around US$1200
I can
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/omega/grande6_4.html
I'm sure you can cut out a bit of the extras and cull it down to about
$1200
The $2500 system
Omega Grande 6 speakers - $800
Skylan Stands - $200
Play sand - $2.53
Jolida 102B Integrated Amp - 550*
Cabling (at 10%) 250**
12 matches
Mail list logo
