I listened to the Cambridge DAC Magic vs. the SB3 analog output on some
AKG 701's using a Sugden class A amp as a headphone amplifier, and I
could hear some very slight differences. The highs sounded a bit more
detailed with the DAC Magic. I couldn't hear any differences in bass.
The difference
agentsmith wrote:
> My transporter was about 2 years old. Just wonder if there ever were
> upgrades to the hardware since its introduction? If I buy a new one
> now, would it be the same box as the last one I bought.
I have not seen any notices of upgrades. And I would not expect any in
the sho
Hi I just sold my transporter and is already missing it.
My transporter was about 2 years old. Just wonder if there ever were
upgrades to the hardware since its introduction? If I buy a new one
now, would it be the same box as the last one I bought.
--
agentsmith
System 1: Transporter+Hi-Li
Personally I think the SB3 analog output is very good. I've tried MANY
external DAC's now, and ultimately returned to the SB3 analog output
with no regrets at all. This will not be a popular view among
enthusiasts that want/enjoy the external DAC approach! But keep in mind
that not -everyone- t
Phil Leigh;439692 Wrote:
> ...perhaps we should concentrate more on galvanic isolation, shielding
> etc?
I personally think that is correct, especially regarding the galvanic
isolation. For instance, different sound cards may seem quite audibly
distinguishable in their digital outputs, due to o
