Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hard facts supporting the quality of Touch digital out.

bhaagensen;547680 Wrote: NewBuyer: thanks for the comments and in particular pointing out one source of the 'long-cable'-argument. Another source that I see quoted from time to time, is this: http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue14/spdif.htm Along with your comment I also note, in this

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Musical Fidelity X-DACv3 and X-PSU v3

Curse it- I have been unable to resist. -- adamdea adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36396

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Musical Fidelity X-DACv3 and X-PSU v3

adamdea;548293 Wrote: Curse it- I have been unable to resist. Sorry... you can blame me later :-) -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SqueezeBox 3 Analog Out added to RMAA Tests

I'm not sure anyone with the same test equipment has tested Transporter and SqueezeBox 3. I did not do another digital attenuation test, but you can compare both running at Max Volume using both 16bit and 24bit to get some idea the difference in performance.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SqueezeBox 3 Analog Out added to RMAA Tests

Thank you very much for conducting and posting these tests. -- NewBuyer NewBuyer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7862 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78917