Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Is Steve Guttenberg stupid?

2011-05-14 Thread michael123
I hate hiss, maybe that was Steve's sense of humor -- michael123 Michael michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85280

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] TP started skipping to next track

2011-05-14 Thread amcluesent
TP has started to suddenly skipping onto playing next track. Going back, track will play to completion. Happens randomly. Log is showing entries like - [11-05-14 20:42:58.2095] Slim::Networking::Slimproto::_disco_handler (611) Unexpected data stream disconnect type: Connection reset by local

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac for SBT

2011-05-14 Thread earwaxer9
shingo43;629532 Wrote: sorry, I know this may be discussed a few times but as a noob I need more info. I compared with SBT with my Rega planet 2000 cd player last night and the difference are subtle,so I wonder if an external dac can give a substantial sound quality improvement, please

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac for SBT

2011-05-14 Thread earwaxer9
http://www.stereomojo.com/Anedio%20Audio%20DAC1%20review/AnedioAudioDAC1REVIEW.htm -- earwaxer9 System: modified Winsome Labs Mouse, modified Maggie MMG's, Transporter, HSU sub 12, MSB DAC to 500 watt sub slave amp, JPS labs power cords, Silver audio interconnect, Audioquest Granite speaker

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Squeezebox Touch with two USB DACs

2011-05-14 Thread earwaxer9
Brings me back to the days when audio kit used to be compared in the A-B type fashion. Sales people had the time and the inclination to go through the stuff they had and try to find a match that fit your pleasure. Looking back, I'm not sure I would trust the A-B comparison now even if it was

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] For the objectivist/empiricists in the crowd

2011-05-14 Thread andy_c
SuperQ;626734 Wrote: It sounds like they're using something like audio diffmaker. It should be easy to reproduce their results. Exactly. They reach the conclusion that the error signal is proportional to the time rate of change of the signal being tested. Why do you suppose this is? Let's