I have always been interested in this companys drivers .
http://www.audiotechnology.dk/iz.asp?id=4|a|132|||
But I shelfed my diy plans, mostly from lack of space living in
apartment leaves no hobby area and ofcourse my 10 thumbs ;) speaker
would have furniture quality not !
--
Mnyb
Phil Leigh;633268 Wrote:
erm... the crystal oscillator(s) always runs at a fixed very high
frequency... the clock circuit that controls the dac runs at the
required sample rate...
as far as I know, that's not the case with AKM,
the only limitation is the (weak) CPU and the (heavy) firmware
michael123;633346 Wrote:
as far as I know, that's not the case with AKM,
the only limitation is the (weak) CPU and the (heavy) firmware
Discussion is pointless since the Transporter line is dead, I am happy
enough it is still supported by the Squeeze ecosystem.
P.S. There are quite a
michael123;633346 Wrote:
as far as I know, that's not the case with AKM,
the only limitation is the (weak) CPU and the (heavy) firmware
Discussion is pointless since the Transporter line is dead, I am happy
enough it is still supported by the Squeeze ecosystem.
P.S. There are quite a
The SE is simply a normal Transporter without the expensive knob on the
front.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
andynormancx's Profile:
I understand that. It is still available so I would therefore not think
that the transporter line is dead.
--
dminches
Modwright Platinum Signature Truth modified Transporter Modwright
LS-100 Modwright KWA-150 Vandersteen 5A
The clock fed into the DAC chip has to be a certain multiple of the
sample rate, usually 128 or 256. Frequently it can be greater as well
such as 512.
Common frequencies for the 48Khz family are 12.288Mhz or 24.576MHz.
IF the minimum multiplier for the DAC chip is 128, and 12.288 was
chosen as
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=219727postcount=3
Transporter:
11.2896 and 24.5760
--
michael123
Michael
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View this thread:
dminches;633376 Wrote:
I understand that. It is still available so I would therefore not think
that the transporter line is dead.
Defo - thats a truism :)
As for the future, the technology-platform on which the TP is built is
dying and along with it, the TP - to stay in the termoninolgy.
michael123;633390 Wrote:
Expensive or not... it is surgically reduced plain Transporter circa
2006
Its not only the TP itself thats reduced - AFAIK its only available
(from Logitech) in the US. So its hardly still going strong...
--
bhaagensen
michael123;633409 Wrote:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=219727postcount=3
Hmm, thats interesting, that means that theoretically it can do 192 but
NOT 176.
John S.
--
JohnSwenson
JohnSwenson's Profile:
11 matches
Mail list logo
