c-eling;673805 Wrote:
> Does fidalizer mess with the performance of other applications or video
> hardware?
It'll mostly focus on system incl. X related optimizations.
It is recommended to start a particluar audio/video related application
"after" Fidelizer have finished its initial job.
So,
ralphpnj;673727 Wrote:
> Nice, very nice, however it is clearly meant to be a joke.
>
> I've been saying for quite some time now that sooner or later someone
> is going to come along with some kind of air purification system which
> they will claim improves the sound of wirelessly transmitted di
Good luck troubleshooting, do let us know how you get on (whenever you
get to it)
By the way you might want to think about paying your wife back for the
emotional rollercoaster there.
--
mashley
mashley's Profile: http://
NOV 30, 2011 | 01:51PM PST
XXX | Pandora
Dear Mark,
Thanks for writing and for the feedback. We just don't have the
resources to do everything we'd like to do all at once. Someday
hopefully we can change the Pandora API so in-home devices like yours
can receive higher bit-rate audio. Thanks
adamdea;673671 Wrote:
> John Atkinson wrote an article on cd players effectively collating the
> measurement information from a number of reviews.
> http://www.stereophile.com/content/case-jitters
>
> It's a very interesting article. It was supposed to be 1 of 3 , the
> other 2 being transports
Does fidalizer mess with the performance of other applications or video
hardware?
--
c-eling
c-eling's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthre
I'm told that nuclear generated electricity generates less audio "noise"
than hydro electric power-can anyone confirm?
--
Fahzz
Living Room: Duet, Adcom GFA 545II, Adcom GFP 555II, Polk SDA 2B
Dining Room: Paradigm Atom Monitor v.5
Bedroom: SB3, Pioneer VSX 5700S,Pinnacle PN 5+, M&K VX-7 Subw
I found significant sound quality improvements running Fidelizer in
Audiophile mode.
Needless to say I wanted to see what difference the Extremist mode
would make. However when I switch to that mode, the Touch isn't
recognised. I tried Customize mode with Network features enabled, but
still no g
magiccarpetride;673697 Wrote:
> Here is an easy tweak that can improve the sound quality: get a roll of
> teflon tape (usually retails for $1.29), and wrap the three prongs of
> your AC power plug with the tape. Plug the AC in, and the tape will
> slide down to the bottom of the metal prongs. Do
Hello, all
We are students in Business Systems, and are currently conducting a
survey regarding to Network Source Separate. The aim of this research
is to gather information about features and functionalities important
for this kind of device.
Please, take 2 minutes for fulfil these questionnaire:
Anyone ?
--
tank121
Squeezebox touch
Arcam A85 amp
Chord rumour speaker cable
Dali Mentor Menuets on Custom Design stands
Room 2
Boom
Bedroom
RADIO
tank121's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=171
If you are doing a side-by-side comparison against your CD player, you
need to make sure the Touch is outputing at 100% volume, and also that
the test is volume matched - it's possible your CD player has a
"hotter" (louder) output than your Touch, which could make your brain
thinks it sounds bette
Im a new Squeezebox/Touch user interested sound quality. My music was
ripped to wav files using iTunes with the import settings at automatic.
(i.e. sample rate: 44.1 kHz, sample size: 16 bit). The sound of the
Touch compared to the original CD seems to my ear to be slightly
depressed at the hig
alfista;673427 Wrote:
> Speaking of sprays, the audiophile running their SB wireless might want
> to see if http://j-walk.com/other/wifispray/index.htm has any
> noticeable effect.
Nice, very nice, however it is clearly meant to be a joke.
I've been saying for quite some time now that sooner or
Ron Olsen;673117 Wrote:
> If you have $30K to spend on your audio system, buy fantastic speakers
> and forget nonsense tweaks.
1) nobody buys 30K$ cable for 30K$
2) be assured, the person has some money in the pocket and the system
to match
What about buying some 50ml perfume box for 200,000$?
tank121;667644 Wrote:
> I'm after suggestions for improving my SQ ?
>
> Currently my Touch (just modified with SC3.0) in stand alone mode is
> feeding by
> QED RCA interconnects into my Arcam A85 amp.
>
> The amp is connected via Chord cable into my Dali Mentor Menuet
> speakers.
>
>
> I was
Anyone with older speakers need to check the drivers to see if they have
foam surrounds. You can damage the speaker playing them with defective
surrounds. The fix is easy and relatively cheap even if you send them
out for repair.
cubdog
--
cubdog
Bel Canto M300 mono blocks
Bel Canto DAC1.5
Sq
I s'pose.but the beauty of it all is that the clamps are removable
should
one find that the results aren't what they were hoping for.
A $2.00 gamble on a ferrite clampor a $30,000 power cord.Either
or...
:)
--
Curt962
Life is precious. I've been to the edge, and learned that G
Archimago;673519 Wrote:
> Was looking at the Transporter review and measurements by John Atkinson
> recently online and noticed that the measured resolution of the
> Transporter was about 20-bits. Amazing - certainly among the best
> they've ever documented!
>
> Wondering what is the highest res
The radio guys here in my company (we make RF and microwave test and
measurement equipment - the best there is) have found that a poorly
executed clamp can actually increase noise. Buyer beware.
--
regalma1
regalma1's Prof
darrenyeats;673595 Wrote:
> The overall THD+N measurements of the Benchmark DAC1 are excellent, in
> the same league as the best anyway. The advantage with the Pre and HDR
> models is that the full resolution is maintained at lower volumes
> thanks to their analogue attenuators.
>
> One nice thi
andynormancx;673611 Wrote:
> Gary wasn't referring to someone claiming that different versions of
> Windows sounding different when outputting audio to their sound cards.
> He was talking about people claiming that they could hear a difference
> in the output of their Squeezebox depending on the
tank121;673631 Wrote:
> I believe I'm correct in thinking that running the Touch in stand alone
> compared to server & touch environment makes no difference to the sound
> quality.
Not sound quality but lots of other benefits in terms of use .
--
garym
Location 1: Vortexbox Appliance 6TB (1.
I believe I'm correct in thinking that running the Touch in stand alone
compared to server & touch environment makes no difference to the sound
quality.
--
tank121
Squeezebox touch
Arcam A85 amp
Chord rumour speaker cable
Dali Mentor Menuets on Custom Design stands
Room 2
Boom
Bedroom
RADIO
jo-wie;673620 Wrote:
> Isn't it called WASABI?
>
>
>
> =D
Oh My! 6am, and now I'm dreaming of a gorgeous piece of Sashimi with a
tiny dab of Wasabe!!
:)
--
Curt962
Life is precious. I've been to the edge, and learned that God is my
friend. Praise Him at every opportunity, and Celebrate
Running the server separately rather than with an attached hard drive
will give more benefit than most other tweaks. I did this and was
shocked at the difference in quality.
--
atchi123
atchi123's Profile: http://forums.
firedog;673594 Wrote:
> ... Newer versions don't. Vista and W7 are setup for WASAPI. ...
Isn't it called WASABI?
=D
--
jo-wie
2 * Classic, 2 * Boom, SC 7.6.2 auf GigaByte STA/C mit VIA C7 1GHz, 1GB
RAM, 250 GB 2,5" HD, Ubuntu Desktop 8.04 LTS, CD -> FLAC = dbpoweramp,
Mix MusicIP, Router
... and the comment above wasn't about different versions of Windows but
only different editions which I believe are no different WRT audio
drivers but mainly in licensing restrictions and administration
details.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and
*New: iPeng for iPad*,
Gary wasn't referring to someone claiming that different versions of
Windows sounding different when outputting audio to their sound cards.
He was talking about people claiming that they could hear a difference
in the output of their Squeezebox depending on the OS flavour that the
server was runni
It's hard ro compare one never knows how they measured.
But better than -120dB is very good then the laws of physics start to
influence any 2 volt source , it's very hard to get the noise much
lower .
it would be good to know which brands that goes for real performance,
so it's very good question
The THD+N measurements of the Benchmark DAC1 are excellent, in the same
league as the best anyway. The advantage with the Pre and HDR models is
that the full resolution is maintained at lower volumes thanks to their
analogue attenuators.
One nice thing about the Transporter and DAC1s is they're a
garym;673389 Wrote:
> Or another thread where a user is trying to decide whether there is
> better sound quality from using windows pro, vista, or XP. sigh
Acutally different versions of Windows do sound different. It's not
because of 0's and 1's per se, but how they process sound. XP has
kernel
32 matches
Mail list logo
