agentsmith wrote:
> Question for below, have you tried mating the Transporter with one of
> those DACs, especially the Debussy? Will I reap the full benefit of the
> improvement? Or is USB/Pure Music or Amarra the connection of choice.
Hi,
I'm about to pull the trigger on a Debussy to add to
Hi, I happen to owned both the Transporter and a Naim DAC. Since then I
have "upgraded" to dCS Debussy driven by Mac Mini and Pure Music.
I never made a comparison between these DACs, but I still miss the
Transporter for its excellent display and interface. And my memory of
it, not having made
Hi
I was doing some testing on Triode's new Squeezelite earlier on my Pi,
with 96/24 flac files and was getting 48KHz input to my processor. To
try and understand why (and haven't yet got to the bottom of it), I
wanted to check that the track was actually being delivered by LMS at
96KHz - so tho
I installed SuperDateTime now and it works..
Anybody knows how can I configure it to look like this?
+---+
|Filename: transport2.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.ph
Brightness' settings are good (again, did not change anything..)
I m thinking.. Could it be that something f**up in the date/time
screensaver settings?
Where are these?
+---+
|Filename: Brightness.png
What about brightness settings here:?
+---+
|Filename: Pic02.jpg|
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=13985|
+-
Server is running 24/7.
When I just press on 'power' button on Transporter - display goes
completely blank (off)
Screen saver's definition - attached (I did not changed there anything
during last few years)
+---+
|Filename: screens
Server going to sleep ? ,but screensaver settings looks more likely .
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97377
Screen saver when off setting?
lrossouw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3416
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97377
___
Julf wrote:
> Old habits die very hard. There is definitely a luddite, anti-technology
> fringe among audiophiles. DSD, being pulse-density modulation, is a more
> primitive, "more analog" encoding than the very "computer-y" PCM... So
> of course DSD sounds "natural" and "analog" while PCM sounds
ralphpnj wrote:
> I'm not sure what is happening but there seems to be the beginning of
> movement in the audiophile world regarding DSD being "better" than high
> resolution PCM (24or 32 bit/88.2, 96, etc. kHz). Why this is happening I
> do not know but this is not the first time I've heard this
Julf wrote:
> There is. 'DSD over USB' (http://dsd-guide.com/dop-open-standard). Not
> sure I would bother - the usual arguments I hear for DSD are mostly of
> the "it is technically closer to analog, so it must be better" ilk...
Yea DSD is basically sony's attempt to copy protection by obscurit
Julf wrote:
> There is. 'DSD over USB' (http://dsd-guide.com/dop-open-standard). Not
> sure I would bother - the usual arguments I hear for DSD are mostly of
> the "it is technically closer to analog, so it must be better" ilk...
Julf,
I'm not sure what is happening but there seems to be the be
jh901 wrote:
> It would be nice if there was a universal DSD output for transports
There is. 'DSD over USB' (http://dsd-guide.com/dop-open-standard). Not
sure I would bother - the usual arguments I hear for DSD are mostly of
the "it is technically closer to analog, so it must be better" ilk...
I agree that transport prices can get out of control. There are
definitely ways to overspend on hi-end audio. And yeah, that's an
understatement.
For my purposes, I needed an SACD transport. It's the only legit way to
get at the DSD encoded on the disc. It would be nice if there was a
univers
Mnyb wrote:
> Progress will come with a mass market lossles standard ,we begin there
> ,no need for hirez just lossles that would be excellent .
Not to mention CD/Redbook material that isn't compressed and
"remastered" to death...
---
... But are we on another topic , someone resurected this old tread to
discuss eventual sonically benefits of 24/192 and flaunted some common
misunderstanding of sampling ?
The bussiness case for 24/192 is another topic if someone sells and
there are buyers there is some kind of market for whatev
Haven't noticed any sox performance problems on my microserver ?
HD tracks also offer 24/96 version of most thier "hi-Rez" or even a
pedestrian 16/44.1 version .
But given HD tracks proven bussiness ethics , there is no way to know
how any of them are mastered or if the differents version is fro
kidstypike wrote:
> Brightness button on the IR remote?
I tried the hard buttons on the Transporter, .. it is not brightness..
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View this thread:
michael123 wrote:
> Not really - what?
Funny.
> Did you read the original statement?
Yes.
> Now, about every album coming from HDTracks or Linn is in 192/24.
Any numbers to support that statement? Most of what I see coming from
both places is 48/24 at best.
And some of it is unfortunately 4
michael123 wrote:
> Hi
>
> when I press on 'power', display is going off completely instead of
> showing date/time..
>
> For about 4 years I use it, this happened few times, but disconnecting
> power helped it..
> I think restart of the server also helped sometimes.
>
> What else can I do?
>
Hi
when I press on 'power', display is going off completely instead of
showing date/time..
For about 4 years I use it, this happened few times, but disconnecting
power helped it..
I think restart of the server also helped sometimes.
What else can I do?
Playback is fine.
-
Julf wrote:
> Not really. Software keeps getting increasingly big and bloated (and RAM
> price keeps dropping), but human hearing hasn't changed much in the last
> couple of thousands of years - and if it has changed, it has probably
> changed for the worse because of all the noise exposure.
Not
23 matches
Mail list logo
