Get one of these and you don't need a DAC with a USB connection.
They also do a version with a BNC connector.
[image:
http://audiooasis.com/storage/HifaceTwo1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1340222584156]
Stratmangler's
Stratmangler wrote:
Get one of these and you don't need a DAC with a USB connection.
They also do a version with a BNC connector.
Good idea. Then I would only need a new amp/pre with a SPDIF or BNC
connector
I'm just trying to do a good ABX on my existing system here.
I think the facts are with the majority's side. My experience of blind
listening was educational and humbling! However, there is a bit of
glibness going on I feel because I wager none of us listened blind when
choosing our loudspeakers.
Now, the traditional excuse is that the differences between
RonM wrote:
Well, duh!
r.
+1 Duh!
darrenyeats wrote:
I think the facts are with the majority's side. My experience of blind
listening was educational and humbling! However, there is a bit of
glibness going on I feel because I wager none of us listened blind when
choosing our
darrenyeats wrote:
I think the facts are with the majority's side. My experience of blind
listening was educational and humbling! However, there is a bit of
glibness going on I feel because I wager none of us listened blind when
choosing our loudspeakers Be careful not to cut down the
mlsstl wrote:
Your post is a good example of conflating two separate issues.
1. No one ever needs to justify their personal preference when choosing
a stereo component for their own use (or for that matter, declaring they
like one vegetable more than another). Even if they sound the same
Lately I've been exploring the world of 24/192 music. So far I must say
that I have yet to encounter a 24/192 track where there looked like
there was any musical content 50kHz!
I know of course one cannot hear up in those registers, but I'm not even
seeing anything that looks musical at all...
