Quad wrote:
> I've always tried to be an enlightened audiophile. I won't do double
> blind tests myself because I'm too lazy, but I usually trust those tests
> and I think they are a good way to find out if something is audible or
> not.
>
> I'm 36 years old and here is what I claim to be able t
SBGK wrote:
>
> I would be worried if I couldn't tell the difference between wav of any
> resolution and 320 mp3, that's like saying you can't tell the difference
> between medium wave radio/internet stream and FM radio.
OMG. Not *THAT* again!
-
SBGK wrote:
>
> I would be worried if I couldn't tell the difference between wav of any
> resolution and 320 mp3, that's like saying you can't tell the difference
> between medium wave radio/internet stream and FM radio.
SBGK,
That is, at the least, an exaggeration isn't it?!
Darren
--
Quad wrote:
> I've always tried to be an enlightened audiophile. I won't do double
> blind tests myself because I'm too lazy, but I usually trust those tests
> and I think they are a good way to find out if something is audible or
> not.
>
> I'm 36 years old and here is what I claim to be able t
I've always tried to be an enlightened audiophile. I won't do double
blind tests myself because I'm too lazy, but I usually trust those tests
and I think they are a good way to find out if something is audible or
not.
I'm 36 years old and here is what I claim to be able to hear and what I
don't:
rattosecond wrote:
> just wondering if there is a easier way to solve this issue.
>
> The touch sounds very good when EDO and TT30 is used its just that
> buffer issue that kills it.
>
> I would like to do it but the code from touchsgotrythm.blogspot.sg
> scares me.
>
> Please please please he
