Archimago wrote:
> Who knows... Certainly the measurements for the old TDA1543x4 DAC was a
> lot grungier, more jittery, and less resolving with 24-bit upsampling
> (it's a 16-bit part). But objectively, in terms of the waveform itself
> and the frequency roll-off, it looks like the TEAC does th
Mnyb wrote:
> The uatenuated grunge >fs may aliase or fold down to the audiable range
> ?
> Affect downstream equipment ?
>
> Maybe the old multibit converters usually used in NOS design has some
> properties that the TEAC can't emulate in its faux " NOS mode"
Who knows... Certainly the measur
