Archimago wrote:
> Yes. There will always be a bit of noise measuring the analogue signal.
> I'll update with ReplayGain as well...
But it is great that you actually try , and this with playback
environments that sometimes seriusly are considered sub optimal :) not
like a squeezebox that is furt
Mnyb wrote:
> ... And your "diff" is very likely limitation in the test method and
> some random noise.
>
> You forgot to mention one cause of confusion in the blog , replay gain
> tags ! WAV does not have but other formats can have it .
Yes. There will always be a bit of noise measuring the an
... And your "diff" is very likely limitation in the test method and
some random noise.
You forgot to mention one cause of confusion in the blog , replay gain
tags ! WAV does not have but other formats can have it .
Mnyb's
Julf wrote:
> I am relieved to see that Claude Shannon (and pretty much every
> information scientist after him) was right after all. News at 11... :)
Claude Elwood Shannon (April 30, 1916 February 24, 2001), RIP.
Hey, it's 2013 we need to be reminded of first principles once awhile.
:-)
--
Archimago wrote:
> A straight forward DiffMaker test... I think the conclusions are quite
> clear!
I am relieved to see that Claude Shannon (and pretty much every
information scientist after him) was right after all. News at 11... :)
A straight forward DiffMaker test... I think the conclusions are quite
clear!
http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2013/05/measurements-do-lossless-compressed.html
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?user
