Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Technical Question: Is the amount of jitter a function of the type of connection?

2015-11-08 Thread Archimago
arnyk wrote: > Given that some of the self-appointed gatekeepers of high end audio have > banned me from their forums after making one innocent post... > > The illusional parts of High End audio would have never worked without a > lot of well organized information management. Yes.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Technical Question: Is the amount of jitter a function of the type of connection?

2015-11-08 Thread Julf
Archimago wrote: > Yes. Pseudoscience can only grow and perpetuate when faith can be > maintained. And... 19172 +---+ |Filename: cragn151107.jpg | |Download:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Technical Question: Is the amount of jitter a function of the type of connection?

2015-11-08 Thread jkeny
arnyk wrote: > Typical jkeny fantasy. I wouldn't eat with him without bringing my own > food taster for fear that his food is as corrupt as his audio claims, > and I don't eat Linguine anyway. ;-) Ah, well, I tried but I see the vitriol is still as vile as always - pity

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Sennheiser Orpheus successor Sennheiser HE1060/HEV1060

2015-11-08 Thread stroom
This as enthousiast as it gets, this review of an audiophile headphone (including insane price tag) http://www.head-fi.org/t/786512/sennheiser-orpheus-successor-the-sennheiser-he1060-hev1060-first-look#post_12046186 Enjoy. == Squeezebox 3 //